Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 82.197 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 82.22]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2009 · leading case: Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC, 685 N.W.2d 320 (Minn. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC, 685 N.W.2d 320 (Minn. 2004). · cites it 16× “" Minn.Stat. § 82.197, subd. 3 (2002). Thus, the initial version of section 82.”

Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC, 771 N.W.2d 14 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 12× “The only statutory requirements for disclosure in real estate transactions, according to Welsh, apply to residentialnot commercial transactions under Minn.Stat. § 82.197 (2002). [12] The plain language of the rule requires that Rand disclose the fact of his dual agency, and on…”

In Re Wren, 699 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 2× “The purchase agreement gave notice that there was a "dual agency" arrangement and, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 82.197, subd. 2 (2004), disclosed that the broker owed fiduciary duties to both the buyer and seller.”

Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. ex rel. City of Richfield v. Wren, 699 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 2× “The purchase agreement gave notice that there was a “dual agency” arrangement and, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 82.197, subd. 2 (2004), disclosed that the broker owed fiduciary duties to both the buyer and seller.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.