Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-141 (2026)

Court actions from which appeal may be taken

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1981, ch. 495, § 21, eff. 7/1/1981.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2010 · leading case: East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010).
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-15-141. A California statute uses language similar to the UAA.”
Tupelo Auto Sales, Ltd. v. Scott, 844 So. 2d 1167 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 11-15-141 & 11-15-101(2).”
Banks v. City Fin. Co., 825 So. 2d 642 (Miss. 2002). “City Finance states in Green Tree, the Plaintiffs' claims were dismissed with prejudice, thus ending the suit in the district court.”
Philisia Banks v. City Fin. Co. (Miss. 2001). “City Finance argues an order compelling arbitration is not appealable under either Miss. Code Ann. § 11-15-141 (Supp. 2002) or 9 U.”
Tupelo Auto Sales, Ltd. v. Gary P. Scott (Miss. 2001). “See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 11-15-141 & 11-15-101(2).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.