Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (2026)

Penalties; injunction; recovery of cost of remedial action; disposition of fines

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1974, ch. 573, § 7; Laws, 1979, ch. 491, § 6; Laws, 1980, ch. 551, § 2; Laws, 1981, ch. 528, § 9; Laws, 1988, ch. 311, § 2; Laws, 1991, ch. 334, § 1; Laws, 1995, ch. 627, § 5; Laws, 2001, ch. 560, § 3; Laws, 2003, ch. 301, § 4, eff. 1/20/2003.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: Donald v. Amoco Prod. Co., 735 So. 2d 161 (Miss. 1999).
Donald v. Amoco Prod. Co., 735 So. 2d 161 (Miss. 1999). · cites it 3× “[Thus] the trial court's broad interpretation of Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4), holding Citizens Bank liable for "creating" an environmental hazard, violates the requirement that [penal] statutes be construed narrowly.”
Midsouth Rail Corp. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co., 697 So. 2d 451 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 8× “The trial court did rule for MidSouth under Count 3 of its counterclaim finding that Citizens Bank was responsible for creating the necessity for a clean-up as provided by Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4) and, therefore, was responsible for paying its pro rata share of the…”
Georgia-Pac. Corp., Inc. v. Mooney, 909 So. 2d 1081 (Miss. 2005). “Miss.Code Ann. § 17-17-29. ¶ 34. The Plaintiffs claim that this case is more like Campbell.”
Aviall Servs., Inc. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 312 F.3d 677 (5th Cir. 2002). “The Mississippi statutes governing disposal of solid wastes, Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-1 et seq., do not appear to contain a provision for private cost recovery.”
Barrett Refining Corp. v. Mississippi Comm'n on Env't Quality, 751 So. 2d 1104 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “Before determining the amount of penalties to assess, the Commission also considered the factors specified in Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-29 and 49-17-43(g) (Rev.”
MidSouth Rail Corp v. Citizens Bk & Tr Co Inc (Miss. 1994). · cites it 7× “Citizens Bank has cross- appealed, asking this Court to rule that Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4) does not create the cause of action that the lower court indicated.”
Melton Props., LLC v. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co. (N.D. Miss. 2020). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 . Thus, the Court finds Valley Creek’s concerns regarding the presence of an actionable injury inapposite to this case.”
Gerald Donald v. Amoco Prod. Co. (Miss. 1997). · cites it 2× “" MidSouth Rail at 460 (quoting Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4) (1995)). In MidSouth Rail, Citizens Bank filed a declaratory judgment action to determine liability to MidSouth Rail for environmental clean-up costs arising from sulphur processing by an ultimately bankrupt sulphur…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29(4): 1 case
Donald v. Amoco Prod. Co., 735 So. 2d 161 (Miss. 1999). “[Thus] the trial court's broad interpretation of Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4), holding Citizens Bank liable for "creating" an environmental hazard, violates the requirement that [penal] statutes be construed narrowly.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.