Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 19-23-11 (2026)

Duties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, Hemingway's 1917, §§ 696, 697; Laws, 1916, ch. 238; 1930, §§ 4225, 4226; 1942, §§ 3915, 3916; Laws, 1978, ch. 509, § 3; Laws, 1985, ch. 518, § 19, eff. 7/1/1985.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2023 · leading case: Thigpen v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984).
Thigpen v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984). · cites it 2× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 19-23-11 (1972). In these circumstances, the addition of the District Attorney to the prosecutorial team changes little.”
Sanders v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n, 466 So. 2d 891 (Miss. 1985). · cites it 6× “Miss. Code Ann. § 19-23-11 (Supp. 1984). By representing the accused school board members at the removal hearing, Sanders violated his obligation to the state and to his county to aid uncompromisingly in the prosecution of persons for unlawful conduct committed in Claiborne…”
State v. Burrill, 312 So. 2d 1 (Miss. 1975). · cites it 2× “The only persons authorized by statute to be present in the grand jury room are district attorneys, section 25-31-13, county attorneys, section 19-23-11, and the attorney general and his assistants, section 7-5-53.”
Daumer v. State, 381 So. 2d 1014 (Miss. 1980). “We think it is logical to hold, and we now hold, that the duty of prosecutors requires them to discharge their duties in prosecuting criminal offenses until the prosecution terminates.”
Necaise v. Logan, 341 So. 2d 91 (Miss. 1976). · cites it 3× “In his opinion the judge also stated that in view of a possible conflict of interest regarding the district attorney, he had asked the county attorney to advise the grand jury pursuant to the authority of Mississippi Code Annotated § 19-23-11 (1972), which provides “. . .It…”
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Fitch (S.D. Miss. 2023). “at § 19-23-11. Plaintiffs herein include voters in need of voting assistance and organizations/individuals, who endeavor to provide that assistance2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.