Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (2026)

Time for payment of fee; written statement to accompany fee; recordation and disbursement of fee; determination of candidate's qualifications; declaration of nominee in single candidate race

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Derived from 1942 Code § 3118 [Codes, 1906, § 3715; Hemingway's 1917, § 6407; 1930, § 5876; Laws, 1928, ch. 128; Laws, 1944, ch. 172; Laws, 1947, 1st Ex Sess, ch. 14; Laws, 1948, ch. 307; Laws, 1960, ch. 477; repealed by Laws, 1970, ch. 506, § 33, and 1986, ch. 495, § 346], and § 3121 [Codes, 1930, § 5879; Laws, 1944, ch. 170; Laws, 1947, 1st Ex. Sess. ch 18; Laws, 1962, chs. 566, 567; Laws, 1976, ch. 481, § 2; repealed by Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 346]; Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 91; Laws, 1987, ch. 499, § 3; Laws, 2000, ch. 592, § 3; Laws, 2003, ch. 428, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 574, § 14; Laws, 2007, ch. 604, § 2, eff. 9/10/2007 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 429, SB 2358,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 392, HB 1048,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 362, SB 2237,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 441, HB 467, 69, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by Laws, 2016, ch. 380, SB 2167, 2, eff. 7/1/2016.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1987–2023 · leading case: Steve Hale v. Mississippi Democratic Exec. Comm., 168 So. 3d 946 (Miss. 2015).
Steve Hale v. Mississippi Democratic Exec. Comm., 168 So. 3d 946 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 12× “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (7) (Rev. 2007).”
Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254 (2003). · cites it 2× “In anticipation of the March 1, 2002, state-law deadline for the qualification of candidates, see Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (Lexis 2001), appellant and cross-appellee Beatrice Branch and others (state plaintiffs) filed suit in a Mississippi State Chancery Court in October…”
Cameron v. Mississippi Repub. Party, 890 So. 2d 836 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 5× “§ 23-15-961 and, in essence, ignore the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299. Cameron argues that since there was no petition timely filed by a contesting party thereby contesting his qualifications pursuant to Miss.”
Garner v. Democratic Exec. Comm., 956 So. 2d 906 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) requires the political parties to determine the qualifications of the candidates seeking office.”
Cummings v. Benderman, 681 So. 2d 97 (Miss. 1996). · cites it 2× “The State Committee met on Saturday, April 29, 1995, and, in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (6), declared Park, their sole remaining candidate, to be the Party's nominee for the District One House of Representatives seat.”
Brian Moore v. Delbert Hosemann, 591 F.3d 741 (5th Cir. 2009). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 23-15-299(3), 23-15-309(1), 23-15-359(3), 23-15-361(1), 23-15-721(3), 23-15-807(e), 23-15-637.”
Monique Brooks Montgomery v. Democratic Exec. Comm., 969 So. 2d 1 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 4× “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (7) (Rev. 2001) (emphasis added).”
Upton v. McKenzie, 761 So. 2d 167 (Miss. 2000). · cites it 2× “The committee, in accordance with Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(6) (1990), declared Park, the sole remaining candidate, to be the party's nominee.”
Hancock Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors v. Ruhr, 487 F. App'x 189 (5th Cir. 2012). “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (2). After qualifying closed, party qualifying elections were held on August 2, 2011.”
Meeks v. Tallahatchie Cnty., 513 So. 2d 563 (Miss. 1987). “On that date Meeks filed his qualifying statement of intent with the Circuit Clerk of Tallahatchie County, Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (Supp. 1987), and paid the statutorily required filing fee.”
Grist v. Farese, 860 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. 2003). “The Fareses cite Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) (Rev.2001), which states: (7) Upon receipt of the proper fee and all necessary information, the proper executive committee shall then determine whether each candidate is a qualified elector of the state, state district, county or…”
Young v. Stevens, 968 So. 2d 1260 (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) (Supp.2006) mandates that the proper executive committees of the political parties shall determine the qualifications of the candidates seeking office.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299(3) — 1 case
Brian Moore v. Delbert Hosemann, 591 F.3d 741 (5th Cir. 2009). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 23-15-299(3), 23-15-309(1), 23-15-359(3), 23-15-361(1), 23-15-721(3), 23-15-807(e), 23-15-637.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299(6) — 1 case
Upton v. McKenzie, 761 So. 2d 167 (Miss. 2000). “The committee, in accordance with Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(6) (1990), declared Park, the sole remaining candidate, to be the party's nominee.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) — 9 cases
Steve Hale v. Mississippi Democratic Exec. Comm., 168 So. 3d 946 (Miss. 2015). “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-299 (7) (Rev. 2007).”
Garner v. Democratic Exec. Comm., 956 So. 2d 906 (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) requires the political parties to determine the qualifications of the candidates seeking office.”
Cameron v. Mississippi Repub. Party, 890 So. 2d 836 (Miss. 2004). “§ 23-15-961 and, in essence, ignore the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299. Cameron argues that since there was no petition timely filed by a contesting party thereby contesting his qualifications pursuant to Miss.”
Grist v. Farese, 860 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. 2003). “The Fareses cite Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) (Rev.2001), which states: (7) Upon receipt of the proper fee and all necessary information, the proper executive committee shall then determine whether each candidate is a qualified elector of the state, state district, county or…”
Young v. Stevens, 968 So. 2d 1260 (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-299(7) (Supp.2006) mandates that the proper executive committees of the political parties shall determine the qualifications of the candidates seeking office.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.