Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (2026)

Certain actions, activities and business relationships prohibited or authorized; contracts in violation of section voidable; penalties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1983, ch. 469, § 3; Laws, 1988, ch. 546, § 4; Laws, 1992, ch. 530, § 10; Laws, 1994, ch. 586, § 1; Laws, 1998, ch. 490, § 1; Laws, 2000, ch. 578, § 2; Laws, 2008, ch. 562, § 13, eff. 8/5/2008 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Frazier v. State by & Through Pittman, 504 So. 2d 675 (Miss. 1987).
Frazier v. State by & Through Pittman, 504 So. 2d 675 (Miss. 1987). · cites it 18× “CONSTITUTION AND STATUTE At issue in this case is the proper interpretation of Article 4, Section 109 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, and whether certain portions of Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (Supp. 1985) violate it.”
Mississippi Ethics Comm'n v. Grisham, 957 So. 2d 997 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 8× “Mississippi Ethics Commission (“Commission”) sought declaratory judgment arguing that step-children are “relative[s]” under Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105(1) which provides, in part, that “[n]o public servant shall use his official position to obtain pecuniary benefit .”
Elec. Data Sys. Corp. v. MS DIV. OF MEDICAID, 853 So. 2d 1192 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 25-4-105 states in pertinent part: (2) No public servant shall be interested, directly or indirectly, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one (1) year after the expiration of such term, in any contract with the state, or any district, county, city or…”
Moore Ex Rel. City of Aberdeen v. Byars, 757 So. 2d 243 (Miss. 2000). · cites it 6× “Byars was charged with having violated Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-4-105 (1), 25-4-105(3)(a), & 25-4-105(5)(1999).”
Mississippi Ethics Com'n v. Aseme, 583 So. 2d 955 (Miss. 1991). · cites it 2× “Aseme and the associations specifically requested declaratory judgment that a contract within the meaning of Article 4, Section 109 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 and Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (2)(f) (Supp. 1987) does not exist between a hospital board and each member…”
Hinds Cmty. Coll. Dist. v. Muse, 725 So. 2d 207 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 4× “" In my view, the intent of the Legislature in adopting Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105 was clearly to protect the public trust in assuring that "use" means the improper exercise of official power to receive a pecuniary benefit that would not otherwise have been available to the…”
Miss. Jud. Performance Com'n v. Coleman, 553 So. 2d 513 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “The complaint therefore charged the respondent with violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (1) (Supp. 1989) by using his official position as Justice Court Judge to obtain *515 pecuniary benefit for himself.”
Smith v. Dorsey, 530 So. 2d 5 (Miss. 1988). · cites it 2× “It therefore follows that insofar as Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (3)(h) attempts to make an exception and authorize such a contract, it is at cross purposes with Sec.”
Towner v. Moore Ex Rel. Quitman Cty. Sch. Dist., 604 So. 2d 1093 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 5× “4, § 109 (1890) and Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (2) (Supp. 1989), and demanded (1) forfeiture of all sums paid to Ezra Towner under his contracts of employment, § 25-4-113, supra; (2) the removal of Mary Towner from the school board, Miss.”
Moore v. McCullough, 633 So. 2d 421 (Miss. 1993). · cites it 4× “McRAE, Justice, dissenting: While I agree that a more persuasive case could have been made against McCullough under Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (3)(c) (1991), I disagree with the majority's interpretation of Miss.”
Dean v. Pub. Emp. Ret. Sys., 797 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105(2) (1999) provides in pertinent part that "[n]o public servant shall be interested, directly or indirectly, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one (1) year after the expiration of such term, in any contract with the State or…”
Moore Ex Rel. Benton Cnty. v. Renick, 626 So. 2d 148 (Miss. 1993). “1991), the Ethics Commission brought suit against a physician for an alleged violation of Section 109 of the Mississippi Constitution and Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (2). Summary judgment was granted in favor of the physician.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105(1) — 2 cases
Mississippi Ethics Comm'n v. Grisham, 957 So. 2d 997 (Miss. 2007). “Mississippi Ethics Commission (“Commission”) sought declaratory judgment arguing that step-children are “relative[s]” under Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105(1) which provides, in part, that “[n]o public servant shall use his official position to obtain pecuniary benefit .”
Hinds Cmty. Coll. Dist. v. Muse, 725 So. 2d 207 (Miss. 1998). “" In my view, the intent of the Legislature in adopting Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105 was clearly to protect the public trust in assuring that "use" means the improper exercise of official power to receive a pecuniary benefit that would not otherwise have been available to the…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105(2) — 3 cases
Dean v. Pub. Emp. Ret. Sys., 797 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105(2) (1999) provides in pertinent part that "[n]o public servant shall be interested, directly or indirectly, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one (1) year after the expiration of such term, in any contract with the State or…”
Huey Stockstill, Inc. v. Hales, 730 So. 2d 539 (Miss. 1998).
Hinds Cmty. Coll. Dist. v. Muse, 725 So. 2d 207 (Miss. 1998). “" In my view, the intent of the Legislature in adopting Miss.Code Ann. § 25-4-105 was clearly to protect the public trust in assuring that "use" means the improper exercise of official power to receive a pecuniary benefit that would not otherwise have been available to the…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105(3)(a) — 1 case
Moore Ex Rel. City of Aberdeen v. Byars, 757 So. 2d 243 (Miss. 2000). “Byars was charged with having violated Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-4-105 (1), 25-4-105(3)(a), & 25-4-105(5)(1999).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105(3)(a)(1999) — 1 case
Moore Ex Rel. City of Aberdeen v. Byars, 757 So. 2d 243 (Miss. 2000). “Byars was charged with having violated Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-4-105 (1), 25-4-105(3)(a), & 25-4-105(5)(1999).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105(3)(h) — 1 case
Frazier v. State by & Through Pittman, 504 So. 2d 675 (Miss. 1987). “CONSTITUTION AND STATUTE At issue in this case is the proper interpretation of Article 4, Section 109 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, and whether certain portions of Miss. Code Ann. § 25-4-105 (Supp. 1985) violate it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.