It is the policy of this state that public records shall be available for inspection by any person unless otherwise provided by this chapter; furthermore, providing access to public records is a duty of each public body and automation of public records must not erode the right of access to those records. As each public body increases its use of, and dependence on, electronic record keeping, each public body must ensure reasonable access to records electronically maintained, subject to records retention.
Laws, 1996, ch. 537, § 5, eff. 7/1/1996.
Notes of Decisions
Cellular South, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecomm., Inc., 214 So. 3d 208 (Miss. 2017).
· cites it 4× “For example, Mississippi Code Section 25-61-2, adopted in and unchanged since 1996, reads as follows: It is the policy of this state that public records shall be available for inspection by any person unless otherwise provided by this chapter; furthermore, providing access to…”
Steven A. DeLoge' v. Desoto Cnty. Sheriff Dep't, 230 So. 3d 1026 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Mississippi Code Annotated section 25-61-2 (Rev. 2010) provides, “It is the policy óf this state that public records shall be available for inspection by any person unless otherwise provided by this [Act].”
Pryer v. State, 139 So. 3d 713 (Miss. 2014).
· cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-61-2 (Rev.2010). . Miss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.