Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-7-9 (2026)

[Effective 1/1/2028] Clerks of the chancery court

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[From and after January 1, 2028, this section shall read as follows:]

Codes, 1880, § 442; 1892, § 1991; 1906, § 2167; Hemingway's 1917, § 1848; 1930, §§ 1786, 1804; 1942, §§ 3932, 3952; Laws, 1928, chs. 87, 227; Laws, 1940, ch. 230; Laws, 1950, ch. 291; Laws, 1968, ch. 361, § 65; Laws, 1970, ch. 397, § 1; Laws, 1970, ch. 398, § 2; Laws, 1981, ch. 497, § 1; Laws, 1993, ch. 481, § 2; Laws, 2004, ch. 505, § 10; Laws, 2005, ch. 323, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 447, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 573, § 2; Laws, 2006, ch. 577, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 476, § 1; Laws, 2010, ch. 398, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 329, § 4, eff. 7/1/2012.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 531, SB 2792,§ 1, eff. 1/1/2028.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 497, HB 719,§ 4, eff. 1/1/2028.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 497, HB 719,§ 4, eff. 1/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2020, ch. 400, HB 1175,§ 1, eff. 6/29/2020.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 485, SB 2827,§ 5, eff. 1/1/2020.

This section is set out more than once due to postponed, multiple, or conflicting amendments.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2004 · leading case: McDonald v. McDonald, 850 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
McDonald v. McDonald, 850 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “" What gives McDonald's claim plausibility is that section 25-7-13 is entitled "Fees for Circuit Clerks," while section 25-7-9 is the one entitled "Fees for Chancery Clerks.”
Cook v. Whiddon, 866 So. 2d 494 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “The Court in McDonald also noted that section 25-7-9 permits a chancery clerk to charge 50 cents when the clerk makes an uncertified copy of a recorded document to give to a member of the public.”
Howard Clayborne McDonald, Jr. v. Rosemary Sheffield McDonald (Miss. 1999). · cites it 4× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-7-9 (1) (a) (Rev. 1999).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 25-7-9(1)(a): 1 case
McDonald v. McDonald, 850 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “" What gives McDonald's claim plausibility is that section 25-7-13 is entitled "Fees for Circuit Clerks," while section 25-7-9 is the one entitled "Fees for Chancery Clerks.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 25-7-9(1)(e): 2 cases
McDonald v. McDonald, 850 So. 2d 1182 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “" What gives McDonald's claim plausibility is that section 25-7-13 is entitled "Fees for Circuit Clerks," while section 25-7-9 is the one entitled "Fees for Chancery Clerks.”
Cook v. Whiddon, 866 So. 2d 494 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). “The Court in McDonald also noted that section 25-7-9 permits a chancery clerk to charge 50 cents when the clerk makes an uncertified copy of a recorded document to give to a member of the public.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.