Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 27-3-51 (2026)

Annual visits to each county of the state; information concerning realty transfers; requests for and verification of realty sales data; salary increases for Department of Revenue appraisers receiving certain certifications

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, Hemingway's 1917, § 7768; 1930, § 7009; 1942, §§ 9198, 9209; Laws, 1916, ch. 98; Laws, 1932, ch. 119; Laws, 1938, ch. 150; Laws, 1980, ch. 505, § 11, ch. 561, § 12; Laws, 1987, ch. 507, § 1; Laws, 1987, ch. 517; Laws, 2009, ch. 492, § 27, eff. 7/1/2010.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 435, SB 2816,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 343, HB 516,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2021.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Rush v. Wallace Rentals, LLC, 837 So. 2d 191 (Miss. 2003).
Rush v. Wallace Rentals, LLC, 837 So. 2d 191 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 27-3-51(2) (1999) states, in pertinent part: The chancery clerk shall require that the current mailing address and current business address or employment telephone number, if any, and current residential telephone number, if any, of each grantor and grantee be…”
Reed v. Florimonte, 987 So. 2d 967 (Miss. 2008). · cites it 2× “On appeal, this Court discussed the egregiousness of Moffite's actions by pointing out that she had violated Mississippi Code Annotated Section 27-3-51(2) and, accordingly, she could have been charged with perjury under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 97-9-61.”
Baron Foreman v. DHP1, LLC (Miss. 2025). · cites it 2× “Foreman also argues that any error in the notice sent to Emmett is harmless because Emmett failed to provide the clerk’s office with a proper address, in violation of Mississippi Code Section 27-3-51(2) (Supp. 2024) (emphasis added), which provides in part: The chancery clerk…”
Betty Reed v. Charles Ray Florimonte (Miss. 2007). · cites it 2× “On appeal, this Court discussed the egregiousness of Moffite’s actions by pointing out that she had violated Mississippi Code Annotated Section 27-3-51(2) and, accordingly, she could have been charged with perjury under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 97-9-61.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 27-3-51(2) — 4 cases
Rush v. Wallace Rentals, LLC, 837 So. 2d 191 (Miss. 2003). “Miss.Code Ann. § 27-3-51(2) (1999) states, in pertinent part: The chancery clerk shall require that the current mailing address and current business address or employment telephone number, if any, and current residential telephone number, if any, of each grantor and grantee be…”
Reed v. Florimonte, 987 So. 2d 967 (Miss. 2008). “On appeal, this Court discussed the egregiousness of Moffite's actions by pointing out that she had violated Mississippi Code Annotated Section 27-3-51(2) and, accordingly, she could have been charged with perjury under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 97-9-61.”
Baron Foreman v. DHP1, LLC (Miss. 2025). “Foreman also argues that any error in the notice sent to Emmett is harmless because Emmett failed to provide the clerk’s office with a proper address, in violation of Mississippi Code Section 27-3-51(2) (Supp. 2024) (emphasis added), which provides in part: The chancery clerk…”
Betty Reed v. Charles Ray Florimonte (Miss. 2007). “On appeal, this Court discussed the egregiousness of Moffite’s actions by pointing out that she had violated Mississippi Code Annotated Section 27-3-51(2) and, accordingly, she could have been charged with perjury under Mississippi Code Annotated Section 97-9-61.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.