Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-3 (2026)

Homestead exemption generally

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to recognize and give effect to the principle of tax-free homes as a public policy in Mississippi, to encourage home building and ownership, and to give additional security to family groups, it is hereby declared that homes legally assessed on the land roll, owned and actually occupied as a home by bona fide residents of this state, who are heads of families, shall be exempt from the ad valorem taxes herein enumerated, on not in excess of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) of the assessed value including an area of land not in excess of that specified hereinafter in this article. The exemption from taxes shall be limited to the following:

Codes, 1942, § 9714; Laws, 1940, ch. 127; Laws, 1946, ch. 261, § 1; Laws, 1950, ch. 302; Laws, 1954, Ex. ch. 31 §§ 1, 2; Laws, 1956, ch. 296, § 17; Laws, 1974, ch. 508, § 1; Laws, 1975, ch. 457, § 1; Laws, 1979, ch. 302, § 5; Laws, 1980, ch. 505, § 1; Laws, 1984, ch. 379, § 1; Laws, 1984, ch. 453, § 1, eff. 5/7/1984.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 484, HB 4130,§ 22, eff. 7/1/2024.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1986–2011 · leading case: 3545 Mitchell Road, LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors, 62 So. 3d 387 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010).
3545 Mitchell Road, LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors, 62 So. 3d 387 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “We note that such an exemption is similar to the favorable treatment found in the homestead exemption in Mississippi Code Annotated section 27-33-3 (Rev.”
Trigg v. Trigg, 498 So. 2d 334 (Miss. 1986). “In Welborn we stated: Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-3 (1972) which provides for the exemption of homesteads for certain taxes, does not affect the right of a co-tenant or tenant in common to partite property commonly or jointly owned.”
City of Jackson v. Pittman, 484 So. 2d 998 (Miss. 1986). “Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-3 (b) and (c) (Supp.”
3545 Mitchell Road, LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors, 62 So. 3d 379 (Miss. 2011). “[I]t is a reduction in the amount of ad valorem taxes owed by the property owner.” Id. However, unlike Section 27-35-50(4)(d), the homestead-exemption statute clearly states that “homes legally assessed on the land roll .”
Bd. of Supervisors v. Duplantier, 583 So. 2d 1275 (Miss. 1991). “We are of the opinion that the 1986 amendment to the Constitution intended that the Class I category for ad valorem taxation include and provide for land actually occupied as the principal home of a family group as contemplated by the homestead statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 27-33-3…”
Pinecrest/Tupelo, L.P. v. Lee Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, No. 2009-CT-00292-SCT (Miss. Feb. 4, 2009). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-3 (1) (Rev. 2010) (emphasis added).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 27-33-3(1): 2 cases
3545 Mitchell Road, LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors, 62 So. 3d 387 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “We note that such an exemption is similar to the favorable treatment found in the homestead exemption in Mississippi Code Annotated section 27-33-3 (Rev.”
3545 Mitchell Road, LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors, 62 So. 3d 379 (Miss. 2011). “[I]t is a reduction in the amount of ad valorem taxes owed by the property owner.” Id. However, unlike Section 27-35-50(4)(d), the homestead-exemption statute clearly states that “homes legally assessed on the land roll .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.