Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 37-11-57 (2026)
Immunity of school personnel from liability for carrying out action in enforcing rules regarding control, discipline, suspension and expulsion of students; exception for students with disabilities
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) Except in the case of excessive force or cruel and unusual punishment, a public school teacher, assistant teacher, principal, or an assistant principal acting within the course and scope of his employment shall not be liable for any action carried out in conformity with state or federal law or rules or regulations of the State Board of Education or the local school board or governing board of a charter school regarding the control, discipline, suspension and expulsion of students. The local school board shall provide any necessary legal defense to a teacher, assistant teacher, principal, or assistant principal in the school district who was acting within the course and scope of his employment in any action which may be filed against such school personnel. A school district or charter school, as the case may be, shall be entitled to reimbursement for legal fees and expenses from its employee if a court finds that the act of the employee was outside the course and scope of his employment, or that the employee was acting with criminal intent. Any action by a school district or charter school against its employee and any action by the employee against the school district or charter school for necessary legal fees and expenses shall be tried to the court in the same suit brought against the school employee.
- (2) Corporal punishment administered in a reasonable manner, or any reasonable action to maintain control and discipline of students taken by a public school teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal acting within the scope of his employment or function and in accordance with any state or federal laws or rules or regulations of the State Board of Education or the local school board or governing board of a charter school does not constitute negligence or child abuse. No public school teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal so acting shall be held liable in a suit for civil damages alleged to have been suffered by a student as a result of the administration of corporal punishment, or the taking of action to maintain control and discipline of a student, unless the court determines that the teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting a wanton and willful disregard of human rights or safety. For the purposes of this subsection, "corporal punishment" means the reasonable use of physical force or physical contact by a teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal, as may be necessary to maintain discipline, to enforce a school rule, for self-protection or for the protection of other students from disruptive students.
- (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section a public school teacher, assistant teacher, principal, assistant principal or other school personnel is prohibited from using corporal punishment, as defined in subsection (2) of this section, on any student with a disability. No school personnel shall be granted immunity from liability under subsection (2) of this section for the use of corporal punishment on a student with a disability. For purposes of this subsection, the term "student with a disability" means a student who has an individualized education plan (IEP) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) or a Section 504 plan under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The term "school personnel" includes all individuals employed on a full-time or part-time basis by a public school.
Laws, 1991, ch. 539, § 5; Laws, 1994, ch. 607, § 16; Laws, 1997, ch. 512, § 1, eff. 7/1/1997.
Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 354, HB 1182,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2019.
Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 497, HB 369, 57, eff. 7/1/2013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2023 · leading case: Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016).
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016). “Miss. Code Ann. § 37-11-57 (2) (Rev. 2013) (emphasis added).”
Pigford v. Jackson Pub. Sch. Dist., 910 So. 2d 575 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “It states as follows: A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duty will not be liable for any claim: *578 (x) arising out of the administration of corporal punishment or the taking of an action to maintain control and…”
M.C. ex rel. Thurman v. Dorsey, 909 F. Supp. 2d 568 (S.D. Miss. 2012). “] §§ 37-11-57 and 11-46-9(l)(x)”); Newcomb ex rel.”
Sharon Moore, Parent & Next Friend of Minor Child, A.T. v. Jackson Pub. Sch. Sys. (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). “[a]rising out of the administration of corporal punishment or the taking of any action to maintain control and discipline of students, as defined in Section 37-11-57, by a teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal of a public school district .”
Matlock v. Bramlett, Jr. (S.D. Miss. 2021). “device, guardrail or median barrier, unless the absence, condition, malfunction or removal is not corrected by the governmental entity responsible for its maintenance within a reasonable time after actual or constructive notice; (x) Arising out of the administration of corporal…”
J.D., by & through her Nat. Mother & Next Friend, Jileta Mingo v. McComb Sch. Dist. (Miss. Ct. App. 2022). “’s negligence claim under the general education statute set forth in Mississippi Code Annotated section 37-11-57(1) (Rev. 2013). J.D. did not raise a claim that the District improperly controlled, disciplined, suspended, or expelled her.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 37-11-57(1) — 2 cases
M.C. ex rel. Thurman v. Dorsey, 909 F. Supp. 2d 568 (S.D. Miss. 2012). “] §§ 37-11-57 and 11-46-9(l)(x)”); Newcomb ex rel.”
J.D., by & through her Nat. Mother & Next Friend, Jileta Mingo v. McComb Sch. Dist. (Miss. Ct. App. 2022). “’s negligence claim under the general education statute set forth in Mississippi Code Annotated section 37-11-57(1) (Rev. 2013). J.D. did not raise a claim that the District improperly controlled, disciplined, suspended, or expelled her.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 37-11-57(2) — 3 cases
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016). “Miss. Code Ann. § 37-11-57 (2) (Rev. 2013) (emphasis added).”
Pigford v. Jackson Pub. Sch. Dist., 910 So. 2d 575 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “It states as follows: A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duty will not be liable for any claim: *578 (x) arising out of the administration of corporal punishment or the taking of an action to maintain control and…”
M.C. ex rel. Thurman v. Dorsey, 909 F. Supp. 2d 568 (S.D. Miss. 2012). “] §§ 37-11-57 and 11-46-9(l)(x)”); Newcomb ex rel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.