Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (2026)
Modification of disposition orders, probation or parole
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) If the youth court finds, after a hearing which complies with the sections governing adjudicatory hearings, that the terms of a delinquency or child in need of supervision disposition order, probation or parole have been violated, the youth court may, in its discretion, revoke the original disposition and make any disposition which it could have originally ordered. The hearing shall be initiated by the filing of a petition that complies with the sections governing petitions in this chapter and that includes a statement of the youth court's original disposition order, probation or parole, the alleged violation of that order, probation or parole, and the facts which show the violation of that order, probation or parole. Summons shall be served in the same manner as summons for an adjudicatory hearing.
- (2) On motion of a child or a child's parent, guardian or custodian, the youth court may, in its discretion, conduct an informal hearing to review the disposition order. If the youth court finds a material change of circumstances relating to the disposition of the child, the youth court may modify the disposition order to any appropriate disposition of equal or greater precedence which the youth court could have originally ordered.
- (3)
- (a) All disposition orders for supervision, probation or placement of a child with an individual or an agency shall be reviewed by the youth court judge or referee at least annually to determine if continued placement, probation or supervision is in the best interest of the child or the public. For children who have been adjudicated abused or neglected, except for those children for which a different timeframe is provided under Section 43-21-603(7), the youth court shall conduct a permanency hearing within one hundred twenty (120) days or every sixty (60) days for children under three (3) years of age after the earlier of:
- (i) An adjudication that the child has been abused or neglected; or
- (ii) The date of the child's removal from the allegedly abusive or neglectful custodian/parent. Notice of such hearing shall be given in accordance with the provisions of Section 43-21-505(5). In conducting the hearing, the judge or referee shall require a written report and may require information or statements from the child's youth court counselor, parent, guardian or custodian, which includes, but is not limited to, an evaluation of the child's progress and recommendations for further supervision or treatment. The judge or referee shall, at the permanency hearing determine the future status of the child, including, but not limited to, whether the child should be returned to the parent(s) or placed with suitable relatives, placed for adoption, placed for the purpose of establishing durable legal custody or should, because of the child's special needs or circumstances, be continued in foster care on a permanent or long-term basis. If the child is in an out-of-state placement, the hearing shall determine whether the out-of-state placement continues to be appropriate and in the best interest of the child. At the permanency hearing the judge or referee shall determine, and the youth court order shall recite that reasonable efforts were made by the Department of Child Protection Services to finalize the child's permanency plan that was in effect on the date of the permanency hearing. The judge or referee may find that reasonable efforts to maintain the child within his home shall not be required in accordance with Section 43-21-603(7)(c), and that the youth court shall continue to conduct permanency hearings for a child who has been adjudicated abused or neglected, at least annually thereafter, for as long as the child remains in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services.
- (b) The court may find that the filing of a termination of parental rights petition is not in the child's best interest if:
- (i) The child is being cared for by a relative; and/or
- (ii) The Department of Child Protection Services has documented compelling and extraordinary reasons why termination of parental rights would not be in the best interests of the child.
- (c) The provisions of this subsection shall also apply to review of cases involving a dependent child; however, such reviews shall take place not less frequently than once each one hundred eighty (180) days, or upon the request of the child's attorney, a parent's attorney, or a parent as deemed appropriate by the youth court in protecting the best interests of the child. A dependent child shall be ordered by the youth court judge or referee to be returned to the custody and home of the child's parent, guardian or custodian unless the judge or referee, upon such review, makes a written finding that the return of the child to the home would be contrary to the child's best interests.
- (d) Reviews are not to be conducted unless explicitly ordered by the youth court concerning those cases in which the court has granted durable legal custody. In such cases, the Department of Child Protection Services shall be released from any oversight or monitoring responsibilities, and relieved of physical and legal custody and supervision of the child.
- (a) All disposition orders for supervision, probation or placement of a child with an individual or an agency shall be reviewed by the youth court judge or referee at least annually to determine if continued placement, probation or supervision is in the best interest of the child or the public. For children who have been adjudicated abused or neglected, except for those children for which a different timeframe is provided under Section 43-21-603(7), the youth court shall conduct a permanency hearing within one hundred twenty (120) days or every sixty (60) days for children under three (3) years of age after the earlier of:
- (4) The provisions of this section do not apply to proceedings concerning durable legal relative guardianship.
Laws, 1979, ch. 506, § 69; Laws, 1980, ch. 550, § 27; Laws, 1985, ch. 486, § 8; Laws, 1996, ch. 409, § 1; Laws, 1997, ch. 440, § 14; Laws, 1998, ch. 516, § 8; Laws, 1999, ch. 569, § 4; Laws, 2002, ch. 342, § 1; Laws, 2003, ch. 450, § 1; Laws, 2004, ch. 417, § 4, eff. 7/1/2004.
Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 531, SB 2792,§ 8, eff. 7/1/2024.
Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 434, HB 1115,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2023.
Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 464, SB 2840,§ 7, eff. 7/1/2019.
Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 427, SB 2680, 5, eff. 7/1/2017.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: In Re the Interest of M.I., 85 So. 3d 856 (Miss. 2012).
In Re the Interest of M.I., 85 So. 3d 856 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(2) (Rev.2009).”
Hall v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 225 So. 3d 1220 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a)(i) (Rev.”
Guardianship of B.A.D. v. Finnegan, 82 So. 3d 608 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a) (Rev. 2009) (emphasis added).”
The Interest of S.A.M., 826 So. 2d 1266 (Miss. 2002). “§§ 43-21-609 & —613, and extinguished the necessity for DHS to oversee and monitor the case and fulfilling the requirement of annual reviews as required under Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613. The youth court noted that durable legal custody, however, is not permanent and is subject…”
In Interest of IG, 467 So. 2d 920 (Miss. 1985). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (2)(3) (1972).”
R.P. v. State, 151 So. 3d 204 (Miss. 2014). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(1) (Rev. 2009) (emphasis added).”
In Re Sam, 826 So. 2d 1266 (Miss. 2002). “§§ 43-21-609 & 613, and extinguished the necessity for DHS to oversee and monitor the case and fulfilling the requirement of annual reviews as required under Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613. The youth court noted that durable legal custody, however, is not permanent and is subject…”
J.P. v. Mississippi Dep't of Human Servs., 742 So. 2d 1095 (Miss. 1999). “” DHS further states that, pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (1993), J.P. retains the option to seek, herself or through the Guardian Ad Litem, modification of the family court’s order, which, DHS believes, is not an order terminating parental rights.”
Hattie T. v. Matthew R. & Melissa R., No. 2022-CP-00926-COA (Miss. Ct. App. June 4, 2024). “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (3)(a). Specifically, 10 [t]he judge .”
In Re Tap, 742 So. 2d 1095 (Miss. 1999). “" DHS further states that, pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (1993), J.P. retains the option to seek, herself or through the Guardian Ad Litem, modification of the family court's order, which, DHS believes, is not an order terminating parental rights.”
In The Interest of A.B., a Minor: Linda Brisco & Joseph Brisco v. Latoya Brisco, No. 2024-CA-00476-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Sept. 2, 2025). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613 (3)(d). As discussed, the temporary custody order was essentially a grant of durable legal custody.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(1): 1 case
R.P. v. State, 151 So. 3d 204 (Miss. 2014). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(1) (Rev. 2009) (emphasis added).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(2): 1 case
In Re the Interest of M.I., 85 So. 3d 856 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(2) (Rev.2009).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3): 1 case
In Re the Interest of M.I., 85 So. 3d 856 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(2) (Rev.2009).”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a): 3 cases
Guardianship of B.A.D. v. Finnegan, 82 So. 3d 608 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a) (Rev. 2009) (emphasis added).”
The Interest of S.A.M., 826 So. 2d 1266 (Miss. 2002). “§§ 43-21-609 & —613, and extinguished the necessity for DHS to oversee and monitor the case and fulfilling the requirement of annual reviews as required under Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613. The youth court noted that durable legal custody, however, is not permanent and is subject…”
In Re Sam, 826 So. 2d 1266 (Miss. 2002). “§§ 43-21-609 & 613, and extinguished the necessity for DHS to oversee and monitor the case and fulfilling the requirement of annual reviews as required under Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613. The youth court noted that durable legal custody, however, is not permanent and is subject…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a)(i): 1 case
Hall v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 225 So. 3d 1220 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a)(i) (Rev.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-613(3)(a)(ii): 1 case
In Re the Interest of M.I., 85 So. 3d 856 (Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-613(2) (Rev.2009).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.