Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-801 (2026)
Authority to adopt administrative review procedure
✓ current as of July 2026
The Department of Corrections is hereby authorized to adopt an administrative review procedure at each of its correctional facilities in compliance with 42 USCS Section 1997, the "Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act," or CRIPA, and Part 40 of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations.
Laws, 1989, ch. 563, § 1, eff. 7/1/1989.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Edwards v. Booker, 796 So. 2d 991 (Miss. 2001).
Edwards v. Booker, 796 So. 2d 991 (Miss. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (1999).”
LaVan Yankton, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, 652 F. App'x 242 (5th Cir. 2016). “2015); see also Miss. Code § 47-5-801, et seq. 10 . See Inmate Handbook, MDOC, ch.”
Timmy Roberts v. Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 219 So. 3d 588 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017). “” (Citing Miss. Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 , -807 (Rev. 2004)).”
Burns v. State, 933 So. 2d 329 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Putnam v. Epps, 63 So. 3d 547 (Miss. 2011). “2007); see Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 to 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Walker v. State, 35 So. 3d 555 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Sobrado v. State, 168 So. 3d 1114 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 to -807 (Rev.2011) (MDOC administrative remedies procedures); Siggers v.”
McKenzie v. State, 66 So. 3d 1274 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “See also Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Moore v. State, 830 So. 2d 1274 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Brown v. State, 54 So. 3d 882 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “2006) (citing Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Lott v. State, 115 So. 3d 903 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013). “2006); see also Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 to-807 (Rev.2004).”
Mixon v. Enlers, 90 So. 3d 635 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “See Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-801 through 47-5-807 (Rev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.