Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2026)
Review of report of law enforcement officer by Commissioner of Public Safety; notice of suspension; seizure of license where test indicates blood alcohol concentration above specified level; temporary permit to drive; denial of permit; representation of state in proceedings
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1)Administrative license suspension for test refusal. The Commissioner of Public Safety, or his authorized agent, shall review the sworn report by a law enforcement officer as provided in Section 63-11-21.
- (a) If upon review the Commissioner of Public Safety, or his authorized agent, finds (i) that the law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds and probable cause to believe the person had been operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways, public roads or streets of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other substance that may impair a person's mental or physical ability; (ii) that the person refused to submit to the chemical test of the person's breath, blood or urine upon request of the officer; and (iii) that the person was informed that his license and driving privileges would be suspended or denied if he refused to submit to the chemical test of his breath, blood or urine, then the Commissioner of Public Safety, or his authorized agent, shall give notice to the licensee that his license or permit to drive, or any nonresident operating privilege, shall be suspended thirty (30) days after the date of the notice for a period of ninety (90) days if the person has not previously been convicted of or nonadjudicated for a violation of Section 63-11-30, or, for a period of one (1) year if the person was previously convicted or nonadjudicated under Section 63-11-30. If the commissioner or his authorized agent determines that the license or permit should not be suspended, he shall return the license or permit to the licensee.
- (b) The notice of suspension shall be in writing and conform to Section 63-1-52.
- (c) A person may continue to drive on either an interlock-restricted license or under a drug-testing program if so ordered by a court in the course of a criminal proceeding for a violation of Section 63-11-30.
- (2)Extension or suspension of privilege to drive; request for trial.
- (a) If the chemical testing of a person's breath indicates the blood alcohol concentration was eight one-hundredths percent (.08%) or more for persons who are above the legal age to purchase alcoholic beverages under state law, or two one-hundredths percent (.02%) or more for persons who are below the legal age to purchase alcoholic beverages under state law, based upon grams of alcohol per one hundred (100) milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per two hundred ten (210) liters of breath as shown by a chemical analysis of the person's blood, breath, or urine, the arresting officer shall seize the license and give the driver a receipt for his license on forms prescribed by the Commissioner of Public Safety and shall promptly forward the license together with a sworn report to the Commissioner of Public Safety. The receipt given a person shall be valid as a permit to operate a motor vehicle for thirty (30) days in order that the defendant may be processed through the court having original jurisdiction and a final disposition had.
- (b) If the defendant requests a trial within thirty (30) days and trial is not commenced within thirty (30) days, then the court shall determine if the delay in the trial is the fault of the defendant or his counsel. If the court finds that it is not the fault of the defendant or his counsel, then the court shall order the defendant's privileges to operate a motor vehicle to be extended until the defendant is convicted upon final order of the court.
- (c) If a receipt or permit to drive issued under this subsection expires without a trial having been requested as provided in this subsection, then the Commissioner of Public Safety, or his authorized agent, shall suspend the license or permit to drive or any nonresident operating privilege for the applicable period of time as provided in subsection (1) of this section.
- (3)Offenders driving without a license. If the person is a resident without a license or permit to operate a motor vehicle in this state, the Commissioner of Public Safety, or his authorized agent, shall deny to the person the issuance of a license or permit for a period of one (1) year beginning thirty (30) days after the date of notice of the suspension.
- (4)Appeal. It shall be the duty of the municipal prosecuting attorney, county prosecuting attorney, an attorney employed under the provisions of Section 19-3-49, or if there is not a prosecuting attorney for the municipality or county, the duty of the district attorney to represent the state in any hearing on a de novo appeal held under the provisions of Section 63-11-25, Section 63-11-37 or Section 63-11-30.
- (5)Suspension subsequent to conviction. Unless the person obtains an interlock-restricted license or the court orders the person to exercise the privilege to operate a motor vehicle only under an interlock-restricted license or while participating in a court-ordered drug-testing program, thirty (30) days after receipt of the court abstract documenting a person's conviction under Section 63-11-30, the Department of Public Safety shall suspend the driver's license and privileges of the person to operate a motor vehicle as follows:
- (a) When sentenced under Section 63-11-30(2):
- (i) For a first offense: one hundred twenty (120) days;
- (ii) For a second offense: one (1) year;
- (iii) For a third offense: for the full period of the person's sentence; upon release from incarceration, the person will be eligible for only an interlock-restricted license for three (3) years;
- (iv) For a fourth or subsequent offense: for the full period of the person's sentence; upon release from incarceration, the person will be eligible for only an interlock-restricted license for ten (10) years and will further be subject to court-ordered drug testing if the original offense involved operating a motor vehicle under the influence of a drug other than alcohol.
- (b) When sentenced under Section 63-11-30(3) (Zero Tolerance for Minors):
- (i) For a first offense: one hundred twenty (120) days;
- (ii) For a second offense: one (1) year;
- (iii) For a third offense occurring within five (5) years, suspend or deny the driving privilege for two (2) years or until the person reaches the age of twenty-one (21), whichever is longer.
- (a) When sentenced under Section 63-11-30(2):
- (6)Suspensions.
- (a) Notices of suspension given under this section shall be in writing and conform to Section 63-1-52.
- (b) Suspensions under this and any other chapter shall run consecutively and not concurrently.
- (c) The first day of any one-hundred-twenty-day period shall begin twenty-one (21) days after entry of judgement of conviction or order of nonadjudication.
- (7)License reinstatement. A person is eligible for an unrestricted license when the person has completed an alcohol safety education program as provided in Section 63-11-32, has satisfied all other conditions of law and of the person's sentence or nonadjudication, and is not otherwise barred from obtaining an unrestricted license.
Codes, 1942, § 8175-12; Laws, 1971, ch. 515, § 12; Laws, 1981, ch. 491, § 5; Laws, 1983, ch. 466, § 4; Laws, 1989, ch. 482, § 25; Laws, 1991, ch. 412, § 2; Laws, 1996, ch. 527, § 9; Laws, 1998, ch. 505, § 1; Laws, 2000, ch. 542, § 2; Laws, 2002, ch. 367, § 2, eff. 7/1/2002.
Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 535, HB 292,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2024.
Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 447, SB 2663,§ 5, eff. 7/1/2020.
Amended by Laws, 2016, ch. 503, SB 2778, 4, eff. 10/1/2016.
Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 493, HB 412, 4, eff. 7/1/2014.
Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 489, HB 481, 7, eff. 7/1/2014.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1986–2003 · leading case: Keyes v. State, 708 So. 2d 540 (Miss. 1998).
Keyes v. State, 708 So. 2d 540 (Miss. 1998). “On July 13, 1993, the Mississippi Department of Public Safety suspended Keyes' driver's license pursuant to its administrative authority under Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2). Keyes had twice been convicted in the Municipal Court of Gulfport of DUI within the five-year period…”
State v. Martin, 495 So. 2d 501 (Miss. 1986). “Martin's driver's license was seized pursuant to the authority of Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2) (Supp. 1985), and he was issued a temporary driving permit which contained printed advice to him that if the D.”
Sheppard v. Miss. State High. Patrol, 693 So. 2d 1326 (Miss. 1997). “Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 is clear the person may be arrested only after he refuses to take the test.”
City of Jackson v. Lipsey, 834 So. 2d 687 (Miss. 2003). “[2] Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-23(2) was amended in 2002 to change the legal limit from 0.”
Mayfield v. State, 612 So. 2d 1120 (Miss. 1992). “NOTES [1] Both parties and the court below refer to the crime proscribed in Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (4) as "vehicular homicide.”
Rigby v. State, 826 So. 2d 694 (Miss. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (Rev.1996 & Supp.”
Mason v. State, 781 So. 2d 99 (Miss. 2000). “2000) make it unlawful to sell alcohol to persons under the age of twenty-one, and § 67-1-81 makes it unlawful for a person under age twenty-one to purchase, receive, or possess alcohol in a public place. Only persons age twenty-one and older may lawfully apply for an alcohol…”
Pulliam v. State, 856 So. 2d 461 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (Supp.2001). ¶ 3.”
Main v. Off. Depot, Inc., 914 F. Supp. 1413 (S.D. Miss. 1996). “Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (rev. 1989). While Plaintiffs and their decedent are within the class of persons protected by the sale of alcohol to minors statute and the Implied Consent Law, they are not within the protection of the statute in this case which is merely designed to…”
State, Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Prine, 687 So. 2d 1116 (Miss. 1996). “Second, this section applied only to the Department’s decision to suspend a license when said license was suspended pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (Supp. 1987); Miss.”
Holmes v. State, 740 So. 2d 952 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 63-11-30 subsequent to administrative license suspension pursuant to § 63-11-23(2)." Keyes resolves Holmes's sixth issue adversely to him.”
Lavinghouse v. Miss. Hwy. Saf. Patrol, 620 So. 2d 971 (Miss. 1993). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (1) (Supp. 1992).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23(1) — 4 cases
State v. Martin, 495 So. 2d 501 (Miss. 1986). “Martin's driver's license was seized pursuant to the authority of Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2) (Supp. 1985), and he was issued a temporary driving permit which contained printed advice to him that if the D.”
Keyes v. State, 708 So. 2d 540 (Miss. 1998). “On July 13, 1993, the Mississippi Department of Public Safety suspended Keyes' driver's license pursuant to its administrative authority under Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2). Keyes had twice been convicted in the Municipal Court of Gulfport of DUI within the five-year period…”
Lavinghouse v. Miss. Hwy. Saf. Patrol, 620 So. 2d 971 (Miss. 1993). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (1) (Supp. 1992).”
Ronnie Keyes v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 1995).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23(2) — 7 cases
Keyes v. State, 708 So. 2d 540 (Miss. 1998). “On July 13, 1993, the Mississippi Department of Public Safety suspended Keyes' driver's license pursuant to its administrative authority under Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2). Keyes had twice been convicted in the Municipal Court of Gulfport of DUI within the five-year period…”
State v. Martin, 495 So. 2d 501 (Miss. 1986). “Martin's driver's license was seized pursuant to the authority of Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (2) (Supp. 1985), and he was issued a temporary driving permit which contained printed advice to him that if the D.”
City of Jackson v. Lipsey, 834 So. 2d 687 (Miss. 2003). “[2] Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-23(2) was amended in 2002 to change the legal limit from 0.”
Holmes v. State, 740 So. 2d 952 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 63-11-30 subsequent to administrative license suspension pursuant to § 63-11-23(2)." Keyes resolves Holmes's sixth issue adversely to him.”
Ronnie Keyes v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 1995).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23(4) — 1 case
Mayfield v. State, 612 So. 2d 1120 (Miss. 1992). “NOTES [1] Both parties and the court below refer to the crime proscribed in Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-23 (4) as "vehicular homicide.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.