Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 65-2-15 (2026)

Appeal to circuit court

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 8041.4-04; Laws, 1972, ch. 511, § 4; Laws, 2007, ch. 502, § 7, eff. 7/1/2007.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–2012 · leading case: T. Jackson Lyons & Assocs., P.A. v. Precious T. Martin, Sr. & Assocs., PLLC, 87 So. 3d 444 (Miss. 2012).
T. Jackson Lyons & Assocs., P.A. v. Precious T. Martin, Sr. & Assocs., PLLC, 87 So. 3d 444 (Miss. 2012). · cites it 4× “However, in that case, the appeal was to the circuit court from an arbitration board under Mississippi Code Section 65-2-15, which specifically required giving a super-sedeas bond, making it a jurisdictional prerequisite under that statute.”
Bertucci v. Dept. of Corr., 597 So. 2d 643 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “1982), we held that supersedeas bond required in appeals to circuit court from arbitration board determinations under Section 65-2-15 is a jurisdictional prerequisite.”
Phillips Constr. Co. v. Mississippi State High. Comm'n, 420 So. 2d 1374 (Miss. 1982). · cites it 4× “[MCA § 65-2-15 (1972) ]. Provisions of the appeal procedure provide “Either party to the dispute may within fifteen (15) days from the date such order is filed with the clerk of the court petition the circuit court of any county in which the contractor operates or has an office…”
Miss. State Pers. Bd. v. Armstrong, 454 So. 2d 912 (Miss. 1984). “1982) (supersedeas bond required in appeals to the circuit court from arbitration board determinations under sections 65-2-15 is jurisdictional prerequisite); Allgood v.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 65-2-15(2): 1 case
T. Jackson Lyons & Assocs., P.A. v. Precious T. Martin, Sr. & Assocs., PLLC, 87 So. 3d 444 (Miss. 2012). “However, in that case, the appeal was to the circuit court from an arbitration board under Mississippi Code Section 65-2-15, which specifically required giving a super-sedeas bond, making it a jurisdictional prerequisite under that statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.