Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (2026)

Medical services and supplies

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 6998-08; Laws, 1948, ch. 354, § 7; Laws, 1950, ch. 412, § 5; reenacted and amended, Laws, 1982, ch. 473, § 8; reenacted without change, Laws, 1990, ch. 405, § 8; Laws, 1992, ch. 577, § 3; Laws, 1995, ch. 582, § 2; Laws, 2012, ch. 522, § 3, eff. 7/1/2012.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 63 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Jordan v. Hercules, Inc., 600 So. 2d 179 (Miss. 1992).
Jordan v. Hercules, Inc., 600 So. 2d 179 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 4× “Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (1) (1972) provides as follows: The employer shall furnish such medical, surgical, and other attendance or treatment, nurse and hospital service, medicine, crutches, artificial members, and other apparatus for such period as the nature of the injury or…”
Mississippi Transp. Com'n v. Dewease, 691 So. 2d 1007 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 5× “" The Highway Commission was ordered to pay for all reasonable and necessary medical services and supplies pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 , including compensation to Mrs.”
Russell v. Orr, 700 So. 2d 619 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (4) (1995). The injury which is the subject of the instant complaint emanates from an alleged failure to diagnose and prescribe proper treatment.”
PDN, INC. v. Loring, 843 So. 2d 685 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 3× “Loring contends that Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 does not provide that the injured employee has the right to choose other treatment and nursing services not administered under the direction of a physician.”
Teresa Patrick v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 681 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 2012). “2d at 976 (citing Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (2000)). Third, just like the temporary denial already analyzed, her mention of a permanent benefit denial could be actionable.”
Congleton v. Shellfish Culture, Inc., 807 So. 2d 492 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (Rev.2000). Congleton states Dr.”
Hardaway Co. v. Bradley, 887 So. 2d 793 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “2000): Should the employer desire, he may have the employee examined by a physician other than of the employee's choosing for the purpose of evaluating temporary or permanent disability or medical treatment being rendered under such reasonable terms and conditions as may be…”
Spann v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 700 So. 2d 308 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 2× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (1972). ¶ 36. Following surgery, if still indicated, and the appropriate period of recovery, it should be determined whether or not maximum medical recovery has indeed been achieved, and if so, whether any temporary or permanent partial disability…”
Swan v. Ip, Inc., 613 So. 2d 846 (Miss. 1993). · cites it 3× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (6) (Supp. 1984).”
Charles Wright v. Turan-Foley Motors, Inc., 269 So. 3d 160 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “However, no rule of the 10 See Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (1) (Supp. 2017); Commission General Rule 9; Bradley & Thompson, Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Law § 5:75 (2017 ed.”
Wesson v. Fred's Inc., 811 So. 2d 464 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “" Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15(1) (Rev.2000). We summarize this statute's requirements.”
Dulaney v. Nat'l Pizza Co., 733 So. 2d 301 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “" Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (Rev.1989) (emphasis added).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15(1) — 18 cases
Wesson v. Fred's Inc., 811 So. 2d 464 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15(1) (Rev.2000). We summarize this statute's requirements.”
Congleton v. Shellfish Culture, Inc., 807 So. 2d 492 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 (Rev.2000). Congleton states Dr.”
Hardaway Co. v. Bradley, 887 So. 2d 793 (Miss. 2004). “2000): Should the employer desire, he may have the employee examined by a physician other than of the employee's choosing for the purpose of evaluating temporary or permanent disability or medical treatment being rendered under such reasonable terms and conditions as may be…”
PDN, INC. v. Loring, 843 So. 2d 685 (Miss. 2003). “Loring contends that Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 does not provide that the injured employee has the right to choose other treatment and nursing services not administered under the direction of a physician.”
Pulliam v. Mississippi State Hudspeth Reg'l Ctr., 147 So. 3d 864 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15(2) — 2 cases
Hardaway Co. v. Bradley, 887 So. 2d 793 (Miss. 2004). “2000): Should the employer desire, he may have the employee examined by a physician other than of the employee's choosing for the purpose of evaluating temporary or permanent disability or medical treatment being rendered under such reasonable terms and conditions as may be…”
Belding v. Belding, 736 So. 2d 425 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15(3) — 3 cases
Ex Parte Se. Alabama Med. Ctr., 835 So. 2d 1042 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002).
PDN, INC. v. Loring, 843 So. 2d 685 (Miss. 2003). “Loring contends that Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-15 does not provide that the injured employee has the right to choose other treatment and nursing services not administered under the direction of a physician.”
Brunson v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 92 So. 3d 90 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-15(6) — 2 cases
Pulliam v. Mississippi State Hudspeth Reg'l Ctr., 147 So. 3d 864 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014).
Nosser v. First Am. Credit Corp., 814 So. 2d 178 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.