Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (2026)

Security for payment of compensation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 6998-38; Laws, 1948, ch. 354, § 32; reenacted without change, Laws, 1982, ch. 473, § 38; Laws, 1988, ch. 560; reenacted without change, Laws, 1990, ch. 405, § 40; Laws, 2004, ch. 347, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 526, § 1, eff. 4/3/2006.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2021 · leading case: H.G. Perkins v. Ins. Co. of North Am..
H.G. Perkins v. Ins. Co. of North Am. (5th Cir. 1986). “After Perkins filed suit against INA, his employer, which was self-insured for worker’s compensation as authorized by Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 , filed a motion to intervene, claiming it was entitled to subrogate the worker’s compensation benefits it paid Perkins against any…”
Lámar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc. (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75(3) (Rev.2000). There is no evidence Fowler Trucking complied with these procedures.”
Lámar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc. (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). “Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (Rev. 2000). In this case, Golden Timber did not obtain insurance through a carrier but was a member of the Mississippi Loggers Self-Insured Fund.”
Jackson Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. South Mississippi Workers Comp. Fund (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). “As the regulatory body responsible for the certification and regulation of self-insurance pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (Rev.1995), the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission (“MWCC” or “Commission”) by order dated July 11,1995, directed: (1) that the Fund continue…”
Washington v. Tem's Junior, Inc. (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (Supp.2007). When an employer “secure[s] payment of compensation” through a workers’ compensation insurance policy, the employer’s statutory responsibility to pay workers’ compensation benefits becomes the responsibility of the carrier.”
Former Bd. of Trs. & Members of Mississippi Comp Choice Self-Insurers Fund v. Mississippi Workers' Comp. Gr (Miss. 2014). · cites it 5× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (3) (Rev. 2011).”
Washington v. Tem's Junior, Inc. (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (Supp. 2007). When an employer "secure[s] payment of compensation" through a workers' compensation insurance policy, the employer's statutory responsibility to pay workers' compensation benefits becomes the responsibility of the carrier.”
Mississippi Dep't of Econ. & Cmty. Dev. v. Gen. Reinsurance Corp. (Miss. Ct. App. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (3) (allowing group self-insurers meeting specified requirements).”
Dustin Ray Rhodes vs Bamaco, Inc. (11th Cir. 2011). “2008) (citing Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75). Bamaco established that it had “secured payment” by obtaining workers’ compensation insurance in Mississippi from Twin City Fire Insurance Company and that Twin City Fire Insurance had a valid “Mississippi Privilege License” on the date…”
Julianna Lamar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc. (Miss. 2003). “Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (3) (Rev. 2000).”
Jackson Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. South Mississippi Workers' Comp. Fund (Miss. 1997). “As the regulatory body responsible for the certification and regulation of self-insurance pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (Rev. 1995), the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission ("MWCC" or "Commission") by order dated July 11, 1995, directed: (1) that the Fund…”
Jackson Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. South Mississippi Workers' Comp. Fund (Miss. 1997). “As the regulatory body responsible for the certification and regulation of self-insurance pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75 (1995), the Workers' Compensation Commission by order dated July 11, 1995, directed: (1) the Fund continue in operation under the Certificate of…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75(1995) — 1 case
— Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-75(3) — 2 cases
Lámar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc. (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 71-3-75(3) (Rev.2000). There is no evidence Fowler Trucking complied with these procedures.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.