Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-207 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 44, eff. 7/1/2010.

Codes, 1942, § 41A:1-207; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 1-207; Laws, 1992, ch. 420, § 70, eff. 1/1/1993.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1995 · leading case: Mid-South Packers, Inc. v. Shoney's, Inc., 761 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1985).
Mid-South Packers, Inc. v. Shoney's, Inc., 761 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1985). “Shoney’s remedy under the circumstances was either to reserve whatever right it might have had to the old price by sending its purchase orders with an “explicit reservation,” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-207, or to find a supplier who would sell at an acceptable price.”
Havard v. Kemper Nat'l Ins. Companies, 945 F. Supp. 953 (S.D. Miss. 1995). “However, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-207(2) 7 (Supp.1994) specifically states that accord and satisfaction is an exception to the gener *957 al rule that a party may reserve its rights on an instrument.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-207(2): 1 case
Havard v. Kemper Nat'l Ins. Companies, 945 F. Supp. 953 (S.D. Miss. 1995). “However, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-207(2) 7 (Supp.1994) specifically states that accord and satisfaction is an exception to the gener *957 al rule that a party may reserve its rights on an instrument.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.