Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-76-1 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Mississippi Gaming Control Act."
Laws, 1990 Ex Sess, ch. 45, § 1, eff. 6/29/1990.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2023 · leading case: Harrah's Vicksburg Corp. v. Pennebaker, 812 So. 2d 163 (Miss. 2001).
Harrah's Vicksburg Corp. v. Pennebaker, 812 So. 2d 163 (Miss. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-76-1 to -34 (2000). "The legislature delegated broad powers to the MGC for handling the development of gaming in Mississippi.”
Mississippi Gaming Com'n v. Freeman, 747 So. 2d 231 (Miss. 1999). “The Mississippi Gaming Control Act, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-76-1 et seq. (1991 & Supp.”
MS GAMING COM'N v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, Inc., 751 So. 2d 1025 (Miss. 1999). “This case presents, as a matter of first impression, the issue of whether the Mississippi Gaming Control Act of 1990, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-76-1 to -281 (1991 & Supp.”
COLUMBIA LAND DEVEL., LLC v. Sec'y of State, 868 So. 2d 1006 (Miss. 2004). “Despite the approval from the Gaming Commission, by letter dated September 18, 1996, the Secretary of State denied the lease and stated that the site did not satisfy the geographical requirements of the Mississippi Gaming Control Act of 1990, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-76-1 et seq.…”
Alexander v. Mississippi Gaming Com'n, 735 So. 2d 360 (Miss. 1999). “The Alexanders assert that the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-76-1 to -313 (1991 & Supp.”
Meeks v. Harrah's Tunica Corp. (In Re Armstrong), 231 B.R. 723 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1999). “See generally Miss. Code Ann. § 75-76-1 , et seq. In 1990 Armstrong began experiencing financial difficulties.”
MS GAMING COM'N v. Six Video Gamb. Devices, 792 So. 2d 321 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-76-1 (Rev.2000). That Act permits gambling in limited locations.”
Willis v. Fordice, 850 F. Supp. 523 (S.D. Miss. 1994). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-76-1 et seq. (1990). The Court therefore concludes that the Choctaw Indian tribe is located in a State that permits Class III gaming “for any purpose by any person, organization, or entity.”
Grand Casino Tunica v. Shindler, 772 So. 2d 1036 (Miss. 2000). “On the other hand, Grand Casino interprets the allegations as falling squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commission over gaming debts under the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-76-1 et seq. (2000). Id.”
Meeks v. Greenville Casino Partners, L.P. (In Re Armstrong), 217 B.R. 569 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1998). “See generally Miss.Code Ann. § 75-76-1, et seq. Beginning in 1994, Armstrong became a “good customer” at LVC, and was considered in the top five to ten percent level of players.”
Mississippi Gaming Comm'n v. Pennebaker, 824 So. 2d 552 (Miss. 2002). “In 1990, the Mississippi Legislature enacted the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-76-1 to -313 (2000).”
Pasquale Deon, Sr. v. David Barasch, 960 F.3d 152 (3rd Cir. 2020). “20, 2019));Mississippi (Miss. Code §§ 75-76-1 to 325); Missouri (Mo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.