Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (2026)

Conditions precedent to issuance of license; penalty for noncompliance

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1930, § 2363; 1942, § 461; Laws, 1930, ch. 237; Laws, 1957, Ex. ch. 17, § 1; Laws, 1983, ch. 522, § 48; Laws, 2008, ch. 442, § 24; Laws, 2010, ch. 476, § 78; Laws, 2012, ch. 431, § 1, eff. 7/1/2012.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 378, HB 277,§ 12, eff. 7/1/2021.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2021 · leading case: Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). · cites it 2× “02 (2004) Mississippi 15/17 Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (Lexis 2004) (female applicants must be 15; male applicants must be 17) Missouri 18 Mo.”
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (d) (Supp. 1987) (female may marry at 15 without parental consent) Mo.”
James Farmer v. State of Florida, 268 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). “02 (2018); Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (2018); Mo. Ann.”
R.B. ex rel. V.D. v. State, 790 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (1994) (obtaining marriage licenses); Id.”
Czekala-Chatham v. State ex rel. Hood, 212 So. 3d 787 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 2× “*795 See Miss.Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (Rev.2013). Mississippi issues marriage licenses to the elderly, those prohibited from conjugal relations due to incarceration, the infertile, and any number of other “miscreants,” including those who abuse children.”
Tanner Hirschfeld v. ATF (4th Cir. 2021). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 ; Neb. Rev. Stat.”
Tanner Hirschfeld v. ATF (4th Cir. 2021). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-5 ; Neb. Rev. Stat.”
RB Ex Rel. VD v. State, 790 So. 2d 830 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 93-1-5 (1994) (obtaining marriage licenses); Id.”
Haralson v. Haralson, 362 So. 2d 190 (Miss. 1978). “(c) Failure to comply with the provisions of sections 93-1-5 to 93-1 — 9 when any marriage affected by such failure has not been followed by cohabitation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.