Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (2026)

Custody and support of minor children; additional remedies; determination of emancipation; temporary support awarded pending determination of parentage; effect of military duty on custody and visitation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 1263.5; Laws, 1960, ch. 268; Laws, 1984, ch. 367; Laws, 1985, ch. 518, § 16; Laws, 1993, ch. 506, § 15; Laws, 1994, ch. 591, § 7; Laws, 1996, ch. 345, § 2; Laws, 1999, ch. 512, § 15; Laws, 2000, ch. 530, § 6; Laws, 2006, ch. 431, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 565, § 2; Laws, 2008, ch. 389, § 3; Laws, 2008, ch. 540, § 1, eff. 7/1/2008.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 77 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Slaughter v. Slaughter, 869 So. 2d 386 (Miss. 2004).
Slaughter v. Slaughter, 869 So. 2d 386 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 10× “In addition, the question is raised as to whether Miss.Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Supp.2003) can confer jurisdiction for a contested divorce.”
McDonald v. McDonald, 39 So. 3d 868 (Miss. 2010). · cites it 2× “Miss Code Ann. 93-11-65(4) (Rev.2004). 15 ¶ 71.”
Gregory Campbell v. Catherine Ann Watts, 192 So. 3d 317 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Rev. 2013) (emphasis added); Miss.”
Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So. 2d 921 (Miss. 1994). “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 reads, in its pertinent parts, as follows: Provided, however, that if the Court shall find that both parties are fit and proper persons to have custody of the children, and that either party is able to adequately provide for the care and maintenance of…”
Ravenstein v. Ravenstein, 167 So. 3d 210 (Miss. 2014). · cites it 2× “As the special concurrence points out, Mississippi Code Section 93-11-65(8) clearly states that the court is granted the discretion to determine whether emancipation has occurred at the age of twenty-one if it has been determined by the court, prior to emancipation, that the…”
Anderson v. Anderson, 961 So. 2d 55 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “" [2] Miss.Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Rev.2004). However, the trial court is not required to follow the child's stated preference.”
Nelson v. Halley, 827 So. 2d 42 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “" Miss.Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Supp. 2002). I find it ludicrous to find on one hand that the Forrest County Chancery Court is vested with jurisdiction over the custody of the child but not the support.”
Nichols v. Tedder, 547 So. 2d 766 (Miss. 1989). “" In addition to the authority conferred by Section 93-5-23, Miss. Code Ann., § 93-11-65 (Supp. 1988), confers upon the chancery court of the proper county the authority to hear and determine matters relative to the "custody, care, support and maintenance of minor children .”
Floyd v. Floyd, 949 So. 2d 26 (Miss. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (2006). The pertinent portion of this statute states: [I]f the court shall find that both parties are fit and proper persons to have custody of the children, and that either party is able to adequately provide for the care and maintenance of the…”
Farra L. Cassidy Sheridan v. James P. Cassidy, Jr., 273 So. 3d 783 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Rev. 2013) (emphasis added).”
Westbrook v. Oglesbee, 606 So. 2d 1142 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (1991 Supp.). This statutory grant, however, is dependent upon parents being considered fit to have custody, and applies only to natural parents.”
Cox v. Moulds, 490 So. 2d 866 (Miss. 1986). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Supp. 1985). There was also testimony concerning the emotional well-being of David's sister.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65(1) — 2 cases
Dobbins v. Coleman, 930 So. 2d 1246 (Miss. 2006).
Swain v. McIntosh, 18 F. Supp. 3d 799 (S.D. Miss. 2013).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65(1)(a) — 7 cases
Edmonds v. Edmonds, 935 So. 2d 980 (Miss. 2006).
Hill v. Mitchell, 818 So. 2d 1221 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Best v. Hinton, 838 So. 2d 306 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Glissen v. Glissen, 910 So. 2d 603 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65(4) — 2 cases
McDonald v. McDonald, 39 So. 3d 868 (Miss. 2010). “Miss Code Ann. 93-11-65(4) (Rev.2004). 15 ¶ 71.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-11-65(8) — 3 cases
Ravenstein v. Ravenstein, 167 So. 3d 210 (Miss. 2014). “As the special concurrence points out, Mississippi Code Section 93-11-65(8) clearly states that the court is granted the discretion to determine whether emancipation has occurred at the age of twenty-one if it has been determined by the court, prior to emancipation, that the…”
Nelson v. Halley, 827 So. 2d 42 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 93-11-65 (Supp. 2002). I find it ludicrous to find on one hand that the Forrest County Chancery Court is vested with jurisdiction over the custody of the child but not the support.”
Hennepin Cnty. v. Hill, 777 N.W.2d 252 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.