Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (2026)

Parties to adoption proceeding; consent of child

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 1269-03; Laws, 1955, Ex. ch. 34, § 3; Laws, 1964, ch. 309, §§ 1, 2; Laws, 1998, ch. 516, § 13; Laws, 1999, ch. 507, § 1; Laws, 2002, ch. 533, § 1, eff. 7/1/2002.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 516, HB 1149,§ 80, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2016, ch. 431, HB 1240, 19, eff. 4/18/2016.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Woodell v. Parker, 860 So. 2d 781 (Miss. 2003).
Woodell v. Parker, 860 So. 2d 781 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 3× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Supp.2003). [4] Also according to Miss.”
Bryant v. Cameron, 473 So. 2d 174 (Miss. 1985). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (1972). Any consent to adoption, verbal or otherwise, given prior to that time is legally ineffective.”
S.R. v. P.L.H., 748 So. 2d 853 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 8× “” However, in this case, the natural father surrendered his parental rights and consented to the adoption by separate instrument filed pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Rev.1994). The appellants cite Hill stating that a guardian ad litem should be appointed because, as in…”
Smith v. Malouf, 722 So. 2d 490 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (1994) provides in relevant part: In the case of a child born out of wedlock, the father shall not be deemed to be a parent for the purpose of this chapter, and no reference shall be made to the illegitimacy of such child [during the adoption process].”
Doe v. Smith, 200 So. 3d 1028 (Miss. 2016). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (1), (4) (Rev. 2013).”
Matter of Adoption of a Minor, 558 So. 2d 854 (Miss. 1990). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 dealing with the parties and consent to adoption merely requires that a sworn consent to the adoption be filed at least three days after birth of the child, and in the absence of this consent process must be had upon all interested parties.”
Swayne v. L.D.S. Soc. Servs., 795 P.2d 637 (Utah 1990). · cites it 2× “40 ¶ 1510 (Smith-Hurd Cum.Supp. 1989). [27] See, e.g., Neb.”
Hemphill-Weathers v. Farrish, 779 So. 2d 167 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Supp.2000). This statute regarding necessary parties for an adoption is useful since the Supreme Court has employed the traditional canon of construction “that each section of the Code dealing with the same or similar subject matter must be read in pari…”
Humphrey v. Pannell, 710 So. 2d 392 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (1994), which requires that "parents" be made parties to the adoption proceedings, does not consider the father of an illegitimate child to be a "parent" for the purposes of the statute at all.”
Ethredge v. Yawn, 605 So. 2d 761 (Miss. 1992). “Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (1972). But any other single act may suffice if it be such that it will allow a court to find by clear and convincing evidence that the abandoning parent has a settled purpose to forgo all duties and relinquish all parental claims to the child.”
Grafe v. Olds, 556 So. 2d 690 (Miss. 1990). “2d 271 (1967) was controlling law; (2) a valid consent was given; (3) there was no valid reason to allow withdrawal of consent; (4) the natural mother physically and legally abandoned the child upon the signing of the consent in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 and…”
Olson v. Flinn, 484 So. 2d 1015 (Miss. 1986). “It is noted that this grandparent did not have a court ordered right of visitation and was not entitled to notice of the subsequently filed adoption under Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 . This Court is not presented here with the question of due process rights to notice of the…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5(1) — 2 cases
Woodell v. Parker, 860 So. 2d 781 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Supp.2003). [4] Also according to Miss.”
S.R. v. P.L.H., 748 So. 2d 853 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “” However, in this case, the natural father surrendered his parental rights and consented to the adoption by separate instrument filed pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Rev.1994). The appellants cite Hill stating that a guardian ad litem should be appointed because, as in…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5(1)(i) — 1 case
In Re Adoption of JDS, 953 So. 2d 1133 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5(3) — 1 case
Sumrall v. Brown, 230 So. 3d 321 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-17-5(l)(c)(ii) — 1 case
S.R. v. P.L.H., 748 So. 2d 853 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “” However, in this case, the natural father surrendered his parental rights and consented to the adoption by separate instrument filed pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 93-17-5 (Rev.1994). The appellants cite Hill stating that a guardian ad litem should be appointed because, as in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.