Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10 (2026)
Disestablishment of paternity
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) This section establishes circumstances under which a legal father may disestablish paternity and terminate a child support obligation when the legal father is not the biological father of the child. To disestablish paternity and terminate a child support obligation, the legal father must file a petition in the court having jurisdiction over the child support obligation. The petition must be served on the mother or other legal guardian or custodian of the child. If the Department of Human Services is or has been a party to the establishment of paternity or collection of child support, the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi must be served with a copy of the petition. The petition must include:
- (a) An affidavit executed by the petitioner that newly discovered evidence relating to the paternity of the child has come to the petitioner's knowledge since the initial paternity determination.
- (b)
- (i) The results of a scientific test or tests that are generally acceptable to the scientific community to show a probability of paternity, administered within one (1) year before the filing of the petition, which results indicate that the legal father is excluded as being the biological father of the child, or
- (ii) an affidavit executed by the petitioner stating that he did not have access to the child to have the scientific testing performed before the filing of the petition. A petitioner who files such an affidavit can request in the petition that the court order the child and mother, if available, be tested.
- (2) The court shall grant relief on a petition filed in accordance with subsection (1) of this section upon a finding by the court of all of the following:
- (a) Newly discovered evidence relating to the paternity of the child has come to the petitioner's knowledge since the initial paternity determination.
- (b) The scientific testing required in subsection (1)(b) of this section was properly conducted.
- (c) The legal father ordered to pay child support has not adopted the child.
- (d) The child was not conceived by artificial insemination while the legal father ordered to pay support and the child's mother were married.
- (e) The legal father ordered to pay child support did not act to prevent the biological father of the child from asserting his parental rights with respect to the child.
- (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, a court shall not set aside the paternity determination or child support order if the legal father engaged in any of the following conduct:
- (a) Married or cohabited with the mother of the child and voluntarily assumed the parental obligation and duty to support the child after having knowledge that he is not the biological father of the child;
- (b) Consented to be named as the biological father on the child's birth certificate and signed the birth certificate application or executed a simple acknowledgment of paternity and failed to withdraw consent or acknowledgment within the time provided for by law in Sections 93-9-9 and 93-9-28, unless he can prove fraud, duress or material mistake of fact;
- (c) Signed a stipulated agreement of paternity that has been approved by order of the court;
- (d) Signed a stipulated agreement of support that has been approved by order of the court after having knowledge that he is not the biological father of the child;
- (e) Been named as the legal father or ordered to pay support by valid order of the court after having declined genetic testing;
- (f) Failed to appear for a scheduled genetic testing draw pursuant to a valid court order compelling him to submit to genetic testing.
- (4) If the petitioner fails to make the requisite showing required by this section, the court shall deny the petition.
- (5) Relief granted pursuant to this section is limited to the issues of prospective child support payments, past-due child support payments, termination of parental rights, custody, and visitation privileges as otherwise provided by law. This section shall not be construed to create a cause of action to recover child support paid before the filing of the petition to disestablish paternity.
- (6) The duty to pay child support and other legal obligations for the child shall not be suspended while the petition is pending except for good cause. However, the court may order that amounts paid as child support be held by the court or the Department of Human Services until final determination of paternity has been made.
- (7) The party requesting genetic testing shall pay any fees associated with the testing.
- (8) In any action brought pursuant to this section, the court on its own motion, or on the motion of any party, may order the biological mother and child, through the child's legal guardian or custodian, to submit to genetic testing.
- (9) If the relief sought under this petition is not granted by the court, the petitioner shall be assessed the court costs, genetic testing fees and reasonable attorney fees.
Laws, 2011, ch. 530, § 1, eff. 7/1/2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case: Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig, 382 S.W.3d 325 (Tenn. 2012).
Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig, 382 S.W.3d 325 (Tenn. 2012). “18 (5) (West 2010); Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(5) (Supp.2011). See generally Kristen K.”
Strickland v. Day, 239 So. 3d 486 (Miss. 2018). “For the preceding reasons, I respectfully concur only in part and in the result.”
Benton ex rel. Brand v. Ivy, 121 So. 3d 226 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “] Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3)(a)-(b). ¶ 99.”
Jones v. Mallett, 125 So. 3d 650 (Miss. 2013). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3) (Rev.2013). Jones does not dispute that he signed a stipulated agreement of paternity that was approved by the chancery court, which subsection (c) clearly identifies as conduct that precluded the chancery court from setting aside the paternity…”
Jacoby W. Lee v. Mississippi Dep't of Human Servs. & Fredrunna Webb (Miss. Ct. App. 2026). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10 (4). ¶7. Further, the chancellor noted that Lee’s petition should also be denied for two additional reasons.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3) — 1 case
Jones v. Mallett, 125 So. 3d 650 (Miss. 2013). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3) (Rev.2013). Jones does not dispute that he signed a stipulated agreement of paternity that was approved by the chancery court, which subsection (c) clearly identifies as conduct that precluded the chancery court from setting aside the paternity…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3)(a) — 1 case
Benton ex rel. Brand v. Ivy, 121 So. 3d 226 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012). “] Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3)(a)-(b). ¶ 99.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3)(c) — 1 case
Jones v. Mallett, 125 So. 3d 650 (Miss. 2013). “Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(3) (Rev.2013). Jones does not dispute that he signed a stipulated agreement of paternity that was approved by the chancery court, which subsection (c) clearly identifies as conduct that precluded the chancery court from setting aside the paternity…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 93-9-10(5) — 1 case
Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig, 382 S.W.3d 325 (Tenn. 2012). “18 (5) (West 2010); Miss.Code Ann. § 93-9-10(5) (Supp.2011). See generally Kristen K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.