Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2026)

Sentence; imposition of fine; payment; imprisonment for nonpayment; indigent defendants

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1979, ch. 501, § 1; Laws, 1998, ch. 380, § 1; Laws, 2010, ch. 492, § 4, eff. 4/7/2010.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 416, HB 387,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2018.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: Berdin v. State, 648 So. 2d 73 (Miss. 1994).
Berdin v. State, 648 So. 2d 73 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 3× “This specific rule of fundamental fairness is reflected in Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2). It mandates that if the court determines a defendant is "financially unable to pay a fine," then the "defendant shall not be imprisoned.”
Conley v. State, 790 So. 2d 773 (Miss. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2)(2000) states in part: The defendant shall not be imprisoned if the defendant is financially unable to pay a fine and so states to the court in writing, under oath, after sentence is pronounced, and the court so finds, except if the defendant is…”
Arnett v. State, 532 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 1988). · cites it 2× “The appellee's reliance on Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (1)(c) (1972) is misplaced.”
Haynes v. State, 811 So. 2d 283 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (Rev.2000). The original sentence is not challenged here, but only the sentence that was imposed after probation was revoked.”
Cassibry v. State, 453 So. 2d 1298 (Miss. 1984). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2) (Supp. 1983).”
Bailey v. State, 956 So. 2d 1016 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (Rev.2000). ¶ 111.”
United States v. Norman L. Haymer, 995 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1993). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2); Cassibry v.”
Jones v. State, 564 So. 2d 848 (Miss. 1990). · cites it 2× “(1) When any court sentences a defendant to pay a fine, the court may order (a) that the fine be paid immediately, or (b) that the fine be paid in installments to the clerk of said court or to the judge, if there be no clerk, or (c) that payment of the fine be a condition of…”
Ross v. State, 122 So. 3d 136 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20. The language in the sentencing order seems to indicate that the payments were due immediately, and the trial court so held at the revocation hearing.”
U.S. v. Haymer, No. 92-7585 (5th Cir. July 1, 1993). “*********** Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2); Cassibry v.”
Glen L. Conley, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, No. 1999-KA-00521-SCT (Miss. July 3, 1998). “Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (2)(2000) states in part: The defendant shall not be imprisoned if the defendant is financially unable to pay a fine and so states to the court in writing, under oath, after sentence is pronounced, and the court so finds, except if the defendant is…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20(1): 1 case
Haynes v. State, 811 So. 2d 283 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (Rev.2000). The original sentence is not challenged here, but only the sentence that was imposed after probation was revoked.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2): 3 cases
Haynes v. State, 811 So. 2d 283 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20 (Rev.2000). The original sentence is not challenged here, but only the sentence that was imposed after probation was revoked.”
United States v. Norman L. Haymer, 995 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1993). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2); Cassibry v.”
Jones v. State, 564 So. 2d 848 (Miss. 1990). “(1) When any court sentences a defendant to pay a fine, the court may order (a) that the fine be paid immediately, or (b) that the fine be paid in installments to the clerk of said court or to the judge, if there be no clerk, or (c) that payment of the fine be a condition of…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2)(2000): 1 case
Conley v. State, 790 So. 2d 773 (Miss. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-20(2)(2000) states in part: The defendant shall not be imprisoned if the defendant is financially unable to pay a fine and so states to the court in writing, under oath, after sentence is pronounced, and the court so finds, except if the defendant is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.