302.225. Surrender of license — record of convictions, kept where, by whom — revocation by city officials prohibited. — 1. Every court having jurisdiction over offenses committed under sections 302.010 to 302.780, or any other law of this state, or county or municipal ordinance, regulating the operation of vehicles on highways or any other offense in which the commission of such offense involves the use of a motor vehicle, including felony convictions, shall, within seven days thereafter, forward to the department of revenue, in a manner approved by the director of the department of public safety a record of any plea or finding of guilty of any person in the court for a violation of sections 302.010 to 302.780 or for any moving traffic violation under the laws of this state or county or municipal ordinances. The record related to offenses involving alcohol, controlled substances, or drugs shall be entered in the Missouri uniform law enforcement system records. The director of revenue shall enter the conviction information into the appropriate computer systems and transmit the conviction information as required in 49 CFR Part 384, or as amended by the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation. The record of all convictions involving the assessment of points as provided in section 302.302 and convictions involving a commercial motor vehicle as defined in section 302.700 furnished by a court to the department of revenue shall be forwarded by the department of revenue within fifteen days of receipt to the Missouri state highway patrol. The record related to offenses involving alcohol, controlled substances, or drugs, or in which the Missouri state highway patrol was the arresting agency shall be entered into the Missouri uniform law enforcement system records.
2. Whenever any person is convicted of any offense or series of offenses for which sections 302.010 to 302.340 makes mandatory the suspension or revocation of the license of such person by the director of revenue, the circuit court in which such conviction is had shall require the surrender to it of all licenses, then held by the person so convicted, and the court shall within seven days thereafter forward the same, together with a record of the conviction, to the director of revenue.
3. No municipal judge or municipal official shall have power to revoke any license.
Notes of Decisions
Brunner v. City of Arnold, 427 S.W.3d 201 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 11× “1) governing traffic; (b) whether City had the authority to enact the ordinance; (c) whether the Ordinance is void as a matter of law because it conflicts with Missouri state laws (particularly Sections 302.225, 302.302, and 302.010(12)) establishing and governing driver’s…”
Edwards v. City of Ellisville, 426 S.W.3d 644 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 6× “281, a Missouri statute governing traffic signal violations, and Sections 302.225 and 302.302, Missouri statutes governing the assessment of points on drivers’ licenses for moving violations.”
Harper v. Dir. of Revenue, 118 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Tardy Notification of Conviction Under Section 302.225. “When a driver is convicted of a point assessable offense, points automatically accumulate against the driver’s license.”
Smith v. City of St. Louis, 409 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “302, which requires the assessment of two points for moving violations, and Section 302.225, which requires the reporting of any person convicted of a moving violation to the Missouri Department of Revenue.”
Unverferth v. City of Florissant, 419 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “Unverferth also sought declaratory judgment that the Ordinance conflicts with Missouri state laws regarding the assessment of points, specifically, Sections 302.225, 302.302, and 302.010(12).”
Damon v. City of Kansas City, 419 S.W.3d 162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 5× “The mandatory language used in the text of the statute [section 302.225 7 ] supports a conclusion that an ordinance of this nature would conñict with state law.”
State v. Miller, 153 S.W.3d 333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “j” We can find no requirement in section 302.225, section 577.051 or 11 C.”
Ballard v. City of Creve Coeur, 419 S.W.3d 109 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
“In their petition, Appellants sought declaratory judgment that the Ordinance conflicts with Sections 304.”
Shepherd v. Dep't of Revenue, 377 S.W.2d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 1964).
· cites it 2× “To all applicants for chauffeur’s license who submit a satisfactory application and meet the requirements set forth in this chapter, the director shall issue or renew a chauffeur’s license * * Section 302.225 “2. Whenever any person is convicted of any offense or series of…”
Suspension of Operator's License of Levin v. Carpenter, 332 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. 1960).
· cites it 2× “Section 302.225, subd. 2 requires “[ejvery court having jurisdiction over offenses committed under * * * any * * * municipal ordinance regulating the operation of vehicles on highways” to forward to the Director, upon forms furnished by him, “a record of the conviction of any…”
Knierim v. James, 677 S.W.2d 322 (Mo. 1984).
· cites it 2× “” Paragraph 3 of Section 302.225 states no municipal judge or municipal official shall have the power to revoke a drivers license.”
Rudd v. David, 444 S.W.2d 457 (Mo. 1969).
“§ 302.225, V.A.M.S. After authorizing a point system and providing the initial point value for certain specified violations the statutes provide, RS Mo 1959 Supp.”
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 302.225(2): 1 case
Harper v. Dir. of Revenue, 118 S.W.3d 195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
“Tardy Notification of Conviction Under Section 302.225. “When a driver is convicted of a point assessable offense, points automatically accumulate against the driver’s license.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.