Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 303.050 (2026)

Security, form and amount

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  303.050.  Security, form and amount — reduced, when. — 1.  The security required under this chapter shall be in such form and in such amount as the director may require but in no case in excess of the limits specified in section 303.030 in reference to the acceptable limits of a policy or bond.  The person depositing security shall specify in writing the person or persons on whose behalf the deposit is made and, at any time while such deposit is in the custody of the director or state treasurer, the person depositing it may, in writing, amend the specification of the person or persons on whose behalf the deposit is made to include an additional person or persons; provided, however, that a single deposit of security shall be applicable only on behalf of persons required to furnish security because of the same accident.

  2.  The director may reduce the amount of security ordered in any case within one year after the date security was first required if, in his judgment, the amount ordered is excessive.  In case the security originally ordered has been deposited, the excess deposited over the reduced amount ordered shall be returned to the depositor or his personal representative forthwith, notwithstanding the provisions of section 303.060.

­­--------

(L. 1953 p. 569 § 303.090, A.L. 1986 S.B. 424)

Effective 7-01-87

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1969–1998 · leading case: Cent. Transp., Inc. v. Blake, 985 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
Cent. Transp., Inc. v. Blake, 985 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Blake argues that the common carrier exception of section 303.050 has been voided as against public policy.”
State ex rel. McPherson v. United Bonding Ins. Co., 446 S.W.2d 158 (Mo. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “Section 303.050 allows a single deposit of security only on behalf of persons required to furnish security because of the same accident.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.