Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 303.210 (2026)

Notice of cancellation of insurance to be given director

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  303.210.  Notice of cancellation of insurance to be given director. — When an insurance carrier has certified a motor vehicle liability policy under section 303.170 or a policy under section 303.180, the insurance so certified shall not be cancelled or terminated until at least ten days after a notice of cancellation or termination of the insurance so certified shall be filed in the office of the director of revenue, except that such policy subsequently procured and certified shall, on the effective date of its certification, terminate the insurance previously certified with respect to any motor vehicle designated in both certificates.

­­--------

(L. 1953 p. 569 § 303.220)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1955–2016 · leading case: Wilson v. Traders Ins. Co., 98 S.W.3d 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
Wilson v. Traders Ins. Co., 98 S.W.3d 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 16× “Those certified policies can be canceled only in accordance with the provisions of section 303.210, RSMo. Documenting that a certified policy is in force is accomplished by filing a form, typically an SR-22 form with the director of revenue.”
Perkins v. Perkins, 284 S.W.2d 603 (Mo. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 12× “The above provision has remained in effect since and is now a part of Section 303.210, Law of Missouri 1953, V.”
Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Brake, 472 S.W.2d 18 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 5× “This case, extensively reviewing precisely the issue here raised, *24 holds that absent “certification” of a policy required by Section 303.210 RSMo 1969, the provisions of that act relating to certain requirements of coverage do not apply.”
Gabler v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 295 S.W.2d 194 (Mo. Ct. App. 1956). “95}4 Illinois Revised Statutes; §§ 303.210, 303.-220 and 303.230 RSMo 1949, V.”
Hong Lu v. Auto. Club Inter-Ins. Exch. & Crystal Gunckel, 510 S.W.3d 348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 28× “Lu alternatively argues that the insurance coverage on the Ford Focus was in force on the date of the accident because Section 303.210 1 required ACHE to give ten days’ notice to the Director of Revenue (the “Director”) before ACHE could terminate insurance coverage on the Ford…”
Am. Stand. Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Rider, 475 S.W.2d 418 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971). “) The respondent intervenor argues that proper construction and application of the Safety Responsibility Law requires the conclusion that the rights of the persons injured are not the same as would otherwise be the case; rather, it maintains, the policy must be read to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.