Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 354
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 354.125 (2026)

Corporation not liable for injuries resulting from medical services rendered members

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  354.125.  Corporation not liable for injuries resulting from medical services rendered members. — A health services corporation shall not be liable for injuries resulting from neglect, misfeasance, malfeasance or malpractice on the part of any person, organization, agency or corporation rendering health services to the health services corporation's members and beneficiaries.

­­--------

(L. 1973 S.B. 3 § 24)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2021 · leading case: Harrell v. Total Health Care, Inc., 781 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harrell v. Total Health Care, Inc., 781 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1989). · cites it 32× “[1] The court of appeals initially affirmed but then granted a rehearing and handed down a carefully considered and helpful opinion, expressing its conclusions on most of the issues involved but concluding that it could not resolve the case because of the appellant's…”
Kilmer v. Hui Chan Mun, 17 S.W.3d 545 (Mo. 2000). · cites it 4× “Similarly, a statute that grants immunity to a class of defendants, as section 354.125 does for health services corporations, does not eliminate an injured person's claim against others who may be liable for his injury.”
LeBlanc v. Rsch. Belton Hosp., 278 S.W.3d 201 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 5× “The supreme court did not address the merits of either claim because it found Total Health Care was immune from any negligence claim against it as a health service corporation under section 354.125, RSMo 1978. 3 Id. at 60-61 .”
Maria del Carmen Ordinola Velazquez, Appellant-Respondent v. Univ. Physician Assocs. (Mo. 2021). “banc 1969) (abolishing common law doctrine of charitable immunity), superseded by § 354.125. 9 In Dodson, this Court rejected equal protection and separation of powers arguments to § 538.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.