Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 392.520 (2026)

Private shared tenant services, coin operated telephone services, regulation of

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  392.520.  Private shared tenant services, coin operated telephone services, regulation of. — 1.  The commission shall have jurisdiction over the provision of private shared tenant services and customer-owned coin telephone telecommunications services, but shall subject such services to the minimum regulation permitted by this chapter for competitive telecommunications services.  The commission shall exempt the provision of private shared and customer-owned coin telephone telecommunications services from the tariff filing requirements of sections 392.220, 392.230, and 392.500 and may exempt the provision of such telecommunications services from the provisions of subdivisions (1) and (3) of section 392.390 and from the provisions of section 386.370.

  2.  The commission shall establish the rates or charges and terms of connection for access by such services to the local exchange network.  In so doing, the commission shall consider the network integrity of the principal provider of local exchange service and the impact of private shared tenant services on the cost to provide, and rates or charges, for local exchange service.  If the commission finds, upon notice and investigation, that tenants in private shared tenant services locations have no alternative access to a local exchange telecommunications company providing basic local telecommunications service, it may require the private shared tenant services provider to make alternative facilities available on reasonable terms and conditions at reasonable prices.

­­--------

(L. 1987 H.B. 360, A.L. 2008 H.B. 1779)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–2004 · leading case: State ex rel. Int'l Telecharge, Inc. v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 806 S.W.2d 680 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
State ex rel. Int'l Telecharge, Inc. v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 806 S.W.2d 680 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “because (I) the Commission failed to make any findings of fact that would support such a decision and the conclusive statements purporting to be findings of fact are unsupported by any competent and substantial evidence in the record; (II) the Commission unlawfully attempted to…”
State Ex Rel. Coffman v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 150 S.W.3d 92 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “390, which provides, in pertinent part: Except as provided in subsection 1 of section 392.520, a telecommunications company shall at a minimum: (5) Be subject to the provisions of subsections 2, 3, 4 and 5 of section 392.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.