Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 43
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 43.507 (2026)

Disclosure of criminal history information, who may receive

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  43.507.  Disclosure of criminal history information, who may receive. — All criminal history information, in the possession or control of the central repository, except criminal intelligence and investigative information, may be made available to qualified persons and organizations for research, evaluative and statistical purposes under written agreements reasonably designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of the information and the protection of the privacy interests of the individuals who are subjects of the criminal history.

­­--------

(L. 1989 S.B. 215 & 58, A.L. 2018 H.B. 1355)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2019 · leading case: State ex rel. Thurman v. Franklin, 810 S.W.2d 694 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Thurman v. Franklin, 810 S.W.2d 694 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “Records required to be closed shall not be destroyed; they shall be inaccessible to the general public and to all persons other than the defendant except as provided in this section and section 43.507, RSMo. They shall be available only to courts, law enforcement agencies, and…”
Arcelia's Mexicana, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor Control, 824 S.W.2d 72 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “The statute provides: Records required to be closed shall not be destroyed; they shall be inaccessible to the general public and to all persons other than the defendant except as provided in this section and section 43.507, RSMo. They shall be available only to courts, law…”
T.V.N. v. Missouri State High. Patrol Crim. Just. Info. Servs., 592 S.W.3d 74 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). “, sections 43.507, 43.531, and 43.532. The Central Repository thus has an interest in ensuring that the criminal history record information it maintains is complete and accurate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.