Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 515
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 515.500 (2026)

Citation of law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  515.500.  Citation of law. — Sections 515.500 to 515.665 may be cited as the "Missouri Commercial Receivership Act".

­­--------

(L. 2016 H.B. 1765 merged with S.B. 578)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2023 · leading case: Meadowfresh Solutions USA, LLC v. Maple Grove Farms, LLC, Leon Rinehart, Ted Dahlstrom, Carol Dahlstrom, Curtis Hall, Lisa Hall, & Kyle Bounous, 578 S.W.3d 758 (Mo. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Meadowfresh Solutions USA, LLC v. Maple Grove Farms, LLC, Leon Rinehart, Ted Dahlstrom, Carol Dahlstrom, Curtis Hall, Lisa Hall, & Kyle Bounous, 578 S.W.3d 758 (Mo. 2019). “665, which provides, "Orders of the court pursuant to sections 515.500 to 515.665 are appealable to the extent allowed under existing law, including subdivision (2) of section 512.”
MEADOWFRESH SOLUTIONS USA, LLC, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. MAPLE GROVE FARMS, LLC, a Missouri Ltd. Liab. Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “§ 515.500 et seq[.] Point II is denied. POINT III Maple Grove’s third point claims that the court abused its discretion in entering an order appointing a receiver because no evidence was offered by the plaintiff nor taken by the court.”
Meadowfresh Solutions USA, LLC, Plaintiffs-respondents v. Maple Grove Farms, LLC, Leon Rinehart, Ted Dahlstrom, Carol Dahlstrom, Curtis Hall, Lisa Hall, & Kyle Bounous (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “The Missouri Commercial Receivership Act—sections 515.500 to 515.665—controls the appointment of a receiver.”
Patriots Bank v. Black River Motel, LLC (Mo. 2023). · cites it 2× “1 provides in relevant part: Except as otherwise provided for by sections 515.500 to 515.665, the court in all cases has exclusive authority over the receiver, and the exclusive possession and right of control with respect to all real property and all tangible and intangible…”
Emily Riegel v. David G. Jungerman (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). “In the first, he argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to revoke the order appointing a receiver, because he was not given proper notice under the Missouri Commercial 8 Receivership Act, § 515.500 et seq.,3 and because he did not have a meaningful opportunity…”
Hofbruhaus of Am.. LLC v. Oak Tree Mgmt. Servs., Inc. (D. Nev. 2023). “) The Receiver Order was entered pursuant to the Missouri Commercial 17 Receivership Act ( Mo. Rev. Stat. §§515.500 , et seq.) (the “MCRA).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.