Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.026 (2026)

Comments on proposed rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  536.026.  Comments on proposed rules — committees for comment. — 1.  In addition to seeking information by other methods, an agency may solicit comments from the public on the subject matter of a rule that the agency is considering proposing.  The agency may file a notice of the rule under consideration as a proposed rulemaking with the secretary of state for publication in the Missouri Register as soon as practicable after the filing thereof in the secretary's office.  The notice may contain the number and the subject matter of the rule as well as a statement indicating where, when, and how persons may comment.

  2.  Each agency may also appoint committees to comment on the subject matter of a rule that the agency is considering proposing.  The membership of those committees must be published at least annually in the Missouri Register.

­­--------

(L. 1997 H.B. 850 § 536.020)

Effective 6-27-97

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2023 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Off. of the Pub. Couns. & Missouri Indus. Energy Consumers v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 331 S.W.3d 677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
State Ex Rel. Off. of the Pub. Couns. & Missouri Indus. Energy Consumers v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 331 S.W.3d 677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “6(4); § 536.026. Accordingly, absent such express incorporation of Staff interpretations into the final order of rulemaking, comments made by the Staff during the comment period cannot be relied upon to attempt to invalidate the Regulations.”
State ex rel. Missouri Coalition for the Env't v. Jt. Comm. on Admin. Rules, 519 S.W.3d 805 (Mo. 2017). “§ 536.026. Normally, within 90 days after the end of the notice and comment period, “the state agency proposing the rule shall file with the Secretary of State a final order of rulemaking either adopting the proposed rule, with or without further changes, or withdrawing the…”
State of Missouri v. Sara M. Eyler (Mo. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “031 are different than the elements of justification in section 536.026. The fact these defenses are predicated on different 3 In pertinent part, section 563.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.