Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.053 (2026)
Standing to challenge rule
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
536.053. Standing to challenge rule. — Any person who is or may be aggrieved by any rule promulgated by a state agency shall have standing to challenge any rule promulgated by a state agency and may bring such an action pursuant to the provisions of section 536.050. Such person shall not be required to exhaust any administrative remedy and shall be considered a nonstate party.
--------
(L. 1999 S.B. 1, et al.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water Comm'n, 102 S.W.3d 10 (Mo. 2003).
Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water Comm'n, 102 S.W.3d 10 (Mo. 2003). “Section 536.053, RSMo 2000, provides that Any person who is or may be aggrieved by any rule promulgated by a state agency shall have standing to challenge any rule promulgated by a state agency and may bring such an action pursuant to the provisions of section 536.”
Borges v. Missouri Pub. Entity Risk Mgmt. Fund, 358 S.W.3d 177 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012). “The circuit court entered summary judgment, finding Borges and Johnson “lack standing under the provisions of § 536.053 RSMo in that there is no promulgated rule at issue.”
Cont'l Coal, Inc. v. Missouri Land Reclamation Comm'n, 150 S.W.3d 371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “And standing to contest the validity of a state regulation in the case was governed by section 536.053, which gives “ ‘[a]ny person who is or may be aggrieved by any rule promulgated by a state agency .”
United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri v. Missouri Bd. of Pharmacy, 159 S.W.3d 361 (Mo. 2005). “Section 536.053 links standing to a promulgated rule.”
Missouri Bankers Ass'n v. Dir. of the Missouri Div. of Credit Unions, 126 S.W.3d 360 (Mo. 2003). “Finally, appellants contend that they also have standing under section 536.053 to challenge the validity of 4 CSR 105-3.”
Mercy Hospitals East Communities v. Missouri Health Facilities Review Comm., 362 S.W.3d 415 (Mo. 2012). “St. John’s also has established that it has standing to contest the rule.”
Turner v. Missouri Dep't of Conservation, 349 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “banc 2003) (“[T]he *443 legislature has expressed [by passing section 536.053] its intent to grant standing to challenge the validity of a rule to any person who is aggrieved to any extent[ ]”), neither statute grants such a plaintiff an ability to challenge the validity of a…”
Israel Ivan Ramirez v. Missouri Dep't of Soc. Servs., Child.'s Div., 501 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). “050 is reinforced by section 536.053, which provides that “[ajny person who is or may be aggrieved by any rale promulgated by a state agency shall have standing to challenge any rule promulgated by' a state agency and may bring such an action pursuant to the provisions of…”
St Louis-Jefferson Solid Waste Mgmt. Dist. v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, State of Missouri (Mo. Ct. App. 2023). “See Section 536.053 (District is considered a "nonstate party"); Section 536.”
Little Sisters of the Poor v. Missouri Dep't of Soc. Servs. & MO Healthnet Div. (Mo. Ct. App. 2020). “And § 536.053 expressly grants standing to “[a]ny person who is or may be aggrieved by any rule 5 It is tempting to question why the AHC proceeded with review of this case when it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over all but one claim (because the claims addressed the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.