566.031. Rape in the second degree, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of rape in the second degree if he or she has sexual intercourse with another person knowing that he or she does so without that person's consent.
2. The offense of rape in the second degree is a class D felony.
Notes of Decisions
S.H. v. James R. Cannon, 504 S.W.3d 817 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “040 -was transferred to Section 566.031, Section 566.070 was transferred to Section 566.”
State v. Ramirez, 527 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 3× “ORDER PER CURIAM Jose Ramirez (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for one count of rape in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.031, RSMo 2000, 1 and one count of felonious restraint, in violation of Section 565.”
John Doe v. Eric T. Olson (Mo. 2024).
· cites it 3× “040, RSMo 1978, was transferred to section 566.031, RSMo Supp. 2013, and captioned as rape in the second degree.”
State v. Mahan, 564 S.W.3d 742 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “, and one count of rape in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.031. On November 27, 2017, the trial court entered judgment and sentenced Appellant to seven years on the count of incest, and a consecutive sentence of 15 years on the count of second-degree rape, for a…”
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-respondent v. Matthew Scott O'leary, 572 S.W.3d 139 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
“ry (“Defendant”) claims the trial court “erred or plainly erred” in accepting the verdicts finding him guilty “on both counts” (respectively, the lesser-included offenses of second-degree rape and second- degree sodomy1) because when the jury was polled, one juror’s (“Juror 30”)…”
State of Missouri v. Robert Allen Taylor (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
“061; and rape in the second degree, § 566.031. The trial court found Taylor to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment on the enticement count, fifteen years’ imprisonment on the sodomy charge to run concurrent to the enticement…”
State of Missouri v. Caleb T. Bellamy (Mo. Ct. App. 2023).
“First, he argues the trial court abused its discretion by failing to intervene when the State criticized defense counsel during the State’s rebuttal argument.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.