15-30-131. Renumbered 15-30-2111. Sec. 1, Ch. 147, L. 2009.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 15-30-131 (2026)
Renumbered 15-30-2111
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 15. TAXATION
CHAPTER 30. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX
Part 1. Rate and Return of Tax (Renumbered, Repealed, and Terminated)
Renumbered 15-30-2111
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1994–1997 · leading case: Sharp v. Dep't of Revenue, 945 P.2d 38 (Mont. 1997).
Sharp v. Dep't of Revenue, 945 P.2d 38 (Mont. 1997). “Section 15-30-131, MCA, was amended to read: þIn the case of a taxpayer other than a resident of this state, adjusted gross income includes the entire amount of adjusted gross income as provided for in 15-30-111.”
Montana Dep't of Revenue v. Dray, 879 P.2d 651 (Mont. 1994). “The DOR contends that Dray is not entitled to claim an alimony deduction because adjusted gross income for nonresident taxpayers is calculated pursuant to § 15-30-131, MCA (1991), and that statute does not expressly provide an alimony deduction for nonresidents.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 15-30-131(1): 2 cases
Sharp v. Dep't of Revenue, 945 P.2d 38 (Mont. 1997). “Section 15-30-131, MCA, was amended to read: þIn the case of a taxpayer other than a resident of this state, adjusted gross income includes the entire amount of adjusted gross income as provided for in 15-30-111.”
Montana Dep't of Revenue v. Dray, 879 P.2d 651 (Mont. 1994). “The DOR contends that Dray is not entitled to claim an alimony deduction because adjusted gross income for nonresident taxpayers is calculated pursuant to § 15-30-131, MCA (1991), and that statute does not expressly provide an alimony deduction for nonresidents.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 15-30-131(3): 1 case
Montana Dep't of Revenue v. Dray, 879 P.2d 651 (Mont. 1994). “The DOR contends that Dray is not entitled to claim an alimony deduction because adjusted gross income for nonresident taxpayers is calculated pursuant to § 15-30-131, MCA (1991), and that statute does not expressly provide an alimony deduction for nonresidents.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.