Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-103 (2026)

Civil And Criminal Actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS

CHAPTER 1. AVAILABILITY OF REMEDIES -- LIABILITY

Part 1. General Provisions

Civil And Criminal Actions

27-1-103. Civil and criminal actions. (1) Actions are of two kinds:

(a) civil; and

(b) criminal.

(2) A civil action is prosecuted by one party against another for the enforcement or protection of a right or the redress or prevention of a wrong. Titles 45 and 46 define and provide for the prosecution of a criminal action. When the violation of a right admits of both a civil and criminal remedy, the right to prosecute the one is not merged in the other.

History: (1)En. Sec. 3473, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 8081, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8999, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 24; re-en. Sec. 8999, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 92-2205, R.C.M. 1947; (2)Ap. p. Sec. 3479, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 8087, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 9005, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 30; re-en. Sec. 9005, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 93-2211, R.C.M. 1947; Ap. p. Sec. 3480, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 8088, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 9006, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 31; re-en. Sec. 9006, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 93-2212, R.C.M. 1947, 93-2212; Ap. p. Sec. 3481, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 8089, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 9007, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 32; re-en. Sec. 9007, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 93-2213, R.C.M. 1947; R.C.M. 1947, 93-2205, 93-2211, 93-2212, 93-2213.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co., 2000 MT 228 (Mont. 2000).
Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co., 2000 MT 228 (Mont. 2000). · cites it 6× “" Section 27-1-103(2), MCA. Here, the Finstads brought suit against W.”
Pena v. State, 2004 MT 293 (Mont. 2004). · cites it 2× “" An "action" is further divided into the two subcategories of "civil action" and "criminal action" in § 27-1-103, MCA: *162 27-1-103. Civil and criminal actions.”
Neal v. State, 2003 MT 53 (Mont. 2003). · cites it 2× “*362 An action is further defined in § 27-1-103, MCA: Civil and criminal actions.”
Peña v. State, 2004 MT 293 (Mont. 2004). · cites it 2× “” An “action” is further divided into the two subcategories of “civil action” and “criminal action” in § 27-1-103, MCA: 27-1-103. Civil and criminal actions.”
Pac. Hide & Fur Depot v. Emineth Custom Homes, Inc., 2016 MT 114 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 2× “¶22 When a case is tried to a jury, the jury is responsible for finding the facts required to determine the case, § 27-1-103, MCA, and must do so “in a spirit of neutrality, fairness and open-mindedness.”
City of Billings v. Beckman, 2002 MT 256N (Mont. 2002). · cites it 4× “Section 27-1-103, MCA, defines actions as either civil or criminal and then at subparagraph (2) provides: A civil action is prosecuted by one party against another for the enforcement or protection of a right or the redress or prevention of a wrong.”
Caekaert v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. (D. Mont. 2024). · cites it 2× “]” Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-103 (6)(f)(ii). Thus, even if Plaintiffs had standing to bring the motion, the Court would refuse to enter an order denying Mapley, Sr.”
Anderson v. Montana Dep't of Pub. Health & Human Servs. (D. Mont. 2024). “For purposes of apportionment pursuant to § 27-1-103(4), a claimant may be considered by the trier of fact.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-103(2): 2 cases
Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co., 2000 MT 228 (Mont. 2000). “" Section 27-1-103(2), MCA. Here, the Finstads brought suit against W.”
City of Billings v. Beckman, 2002 MT 256N (Mont. 2002). “Section 27-1-103, MCA, defines actions as either civil or criminal and then at subparagraph (2) provides: A civil action is prosecuted by one party against another for the enforcement or protection of a right or the redress or prevention of a wrong.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-103(4): 1 case
Anderson v. Montana Dep't of Pub. Health & Human Servs. (D. Mont. 2024). “For purposes of apportionment pursuant to § 27-1-103(4), a claimant may be considered by the trier of fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.