27-1-202. Right to compensatory damages. Every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another may recover from the person in fault a compensation for it in money, which is called damages. The measure of the damages recoverable from the person in fault for the reasonable value of medical services or treatment in actions arising from bodily injury or death is set forth in 27-1-308.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-202 (2026)
Right To Compensatory Damages
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS
CHAPTER 1. AVAILABILITY OF REMEDIES -- LIABILITY
Part 2. Damages
Right To Compensatory Damages
History: En. Sec. 4270, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6040, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8659, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3281; Field Civ. C. Sec. 1832; re-en. Sec. 8659, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 17-201; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 327, L. 2021.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: Mitchell v. Glacier Cnty., 2017 MT 258 (Mont. 2017).
Mitchell v. Glacier Cnty., 2017 MT 258 (Mont. 2017). “(Citing § 27-1-202, MCA.) ¶29 The Act provides that, when a local government entity fails to comply with financial reporting requirements, “the department may issue an order stopping payment of any state financial assistance to the local government entity.”
Henricksen v. State, 2004 MT 20 (Mont. 2004). “Section 27-1-202, MCA. Emotional distress produces its own unique damages.”
Dorwart v. Caraway, 2002 MT 240 (Mont. 2002). “Section 27-1-202, MCA, provides that: Every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another may recover from the person in fault a compensation therefor in money, which is called damages.”
Lauman v. Lee, 626 P.2d 830 (Mont. 1981). “Section 27-1-202, MCA, allows compensatory damages to every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act of another.”
State Med. Oxygen & Supply, Inc. v. Am. Med. Oxygen Co., 750 P.2d 1085 (Mont. 1988). “Section 1395nn give rise to a private cause of action under Section 27-1-202, MCA? 2. Did the court err in deciding the motion for summary judgment prior to receiving the depositions of three material witnesses? 3.”
Jacobson v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 2016 MT 101 (Mont. 2016). “¶53 Section 27-1-202, MCA, provides that “[e]very person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another may recover .”
v. Smith-Cote (In re Cote), 433 P.3d 221 (Mont. 2019). “The language of § 27-1-202, MCA, which grants the right to compensatory damages, is plain: "Every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another may recover from the person in fault a compensation therefor in money , which is called damages.”
Meek v. Montana Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 2015 MT 130 (Mont. 2015). “Section 27-1-202, MCA. While the measure of damages for pain and suffering, emotional disturbances, and even future medical expenses necessarily must be left to the discretion of the jury, the measure of damages for past medical expenses must be the 12 amount that was expended…”
Mark Ibsen, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc., 2016 MT 111 (Mont. 2016). “¶51 Ibsen and amicus MTLA urge us to consider § 27-1-202, MCA, which states “Every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another may recover from the person in fault a compensation therefor in money, which is called damages.”
Cechovic v. Hardin & Assocs., Inc., 902 P.2d 520 (Mont. 1995). “Section 27-1-202, MCA. Detriment is defined as a loss or harm suffered in person or property.”
Harris v. St Vincent & Billings C, 2013 MT 207 (Mont. 2013). “” A “detriment” is “a loss or harm suffered in person or property.”
Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & Son, 2000 MT 357 (Mont. 2000). “To aid our reading, this Court frequently turns to familiar maxims or canons of statutory construction, including but not limited to: ejusdem generis (general words will be construed according to more specific and particular preceding words); expressio unius est exclusio…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.