Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307 (2026)

Civil Liabilities -- Limitations On Actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE

CHAPTER 10. SECURITIES REGULATION

Part 3. Offenses, Penalties, and Immunities

Civil Liabilities -- Limitations On Actions

30-10-307. Civil liabilities -- limitations on actions. (1) Any person who offers or sells a security in violation of 30-10-202 or offers or sells a security by means of fraud or misrepresentation is liable to the person buying the security from the offeror or seller, who may sue either at law or in equity to recover the consideration paid for the security, together with interest at 10% a year from the date of payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, less the amount of any income received on the security, upon the tender of the security, or for damages if the buyer no longer owns the security. Damages are the amount that would be recoverable upon a tender less:

(a) the value of the security when the buyer disposed of it; and

(b) interest at 10% a year from the date of disposition.

(2) Every person who directly or indirectly controls a seller liable under subsection (1), every partner, officer, or director (or person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions) or employee of the seller, and every broker-dealer or salesperson who participates or materially aids in the sale is liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent as the seller if the nonseller knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care could have known, of the existence of the facts by reason of which the liability is alleged to exist. There must be contribution among the several liable persons.

(3) Any tender specified in this section may be made at any time before entry of judgment. A cause of action under this statute survives the death of any person who might have been a plaintiff or a defendant. A person may not sue under this section if:

(a) the buyer has received a written offer, at a time when the buyer owned the security, to refund the consideration paid, together with interest at 10% a year from the date of payment, less the amount of any income received on the security and the buyer failed to accept the offer within 30 days of its receipt; or

(b) the buyer has received a written offer at a time when the buyer did not own the security in the amount that would be recoverable under subsection (1) upon a tender less:

(i) the value of the security when the buyer disposed of it; and

(ii) interest at 10% a year from the date of disposition.

(4) A person who has made or engaged in the performance of any contract in violation of any provision of parts 1 through 3 of this chapter or any rule or order under parts 1 through 3 of this chapter or who has acquired any purported right under the contract with knowledge of the facts by reason of which its making or performance was in violation may not base any suit on the contract. Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with any provision of parts 1 through 3 of this chapter or any rule or order adopted under parts 1 through 3 of this chapter is void as against public policy and in the public interest.

(5) (a) An action may not be maintained under this section to enforce any liability founded on a violation of 30-10-202 unless it is brought within 1 year after discovery of the violation or after the discovery should have been made by exercise of reasonable diligence.

(b) An action may not be maintained under this section to enforce any liability founded on fraud or misrepresentation unless it is brought within 2 years after discovery of the fraud or misrepresentation on which the liability is founded or after the discovery should have been made by the exercise of reasonable diligence.

(c) An action may not be maintained under this section to enforce any liability founded on fraud or misrepresentation unless it is brought within 5 years after the transaction on which the action is based.

History: En. Sec. 22, Ch. 251, L. 1961; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 213, L. 1967; R.C.M. 1947, 15-2022; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 280, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 231, L. 1987; amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 272, L. 1987; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 162, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 904, Ch. 56, L. 2009; amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 8, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Thiel v. Taurus Drilling Ltd. 1980-ii, 710 P.2d 33 (Mont. 1985).
Thiel v. Taurus Drilling Ltd. 1980-ii, 710 P.2d 33 (Mont. 1985). · cites it 30× “The United States District Court for the District of Montana has certified the following question to this Court: What statute or statutes of limitation apply to civil actions brought pursuant to § 30-10-307, MCA, of the Securities Act of Montana? Based upon the pleadings in this…”
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 40× “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc., 2015 MT 284 (Mont. 2015). · cites it 31× “The District Court concluded the following: “Misrepresentation” under § 30-10-307(1), MCA, is not a matter of strict liability but requires a showing of failure to use reasonable care regarding the truth or accuracy of statements made in the offer or sale of a security; Forquest…”
State v. Himes, 2015 MT 91 (Mont. 2015). · cites it 7× “” Section 30-10-307(1), MCA. ¶60 Himes argues that the $150,000 restitution award was clearly *432 erroneous because he was acquitted of the theft-related charges, and the State did not prove that there was a causal connection between his “crimes” and Serata’s loss.”
State Ex Rel. Vranish v. Dist. Court, 741 P.2d 412 (Mont. 1987). · cites it 32× “On May 23, 1986, relators moved the trial court for a ruling that an eight-year statute of limitations applied to Count 1 of their second amended complaint because it was part of a statutory claim under the Securities Act of Montana, § 30-10-307, MCA. The trial court found that…”
Waveland Capital Partners, LLC v. Tommerup, 928 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (D. Mont. 2013). · cites it 2× “§ 27-2-211, two years statute of limitations), — the Montana and Utah Securities Act claims (two years statute of limitations, Mont.Code Ann. § 30-10-307(5), and Utah Code Ann.”
Thiel v. Taurus Drilling Ltd. 19 (Mont. 1985). · cites it 2× “The U n i t e d S t a t e s District Court for the D i s t r i c t of Montana h a s c e r t i f i e d t h e f o l l o w i n g q u e s t i o n t o t h i s C o u r t : What s t a t u t e o r s t a t u t e s o f l i m i t a t i o n a p p l y t o c i v i l a c t i o n s b r o u g h…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307(1) — 3 cases
Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc., 2015 MT 284 (Mont. 2015). “The District Court concluded the following: “Misrepresentation” under § 30-10-307(1), MCA, is not a matter of strict liability but requires a showing of failure to use reasonable care regarding the truth or accuracy of statements made in the offer or sale of a security; Forquest…”
State v. Himes, 2015 MT 91 (Mont. 2015). “” Section 30-10-307(1), MCA. ¶60 Himes argues that the $150,000 restitution award was clearly *432 erroneous because he was acquitted of the theft-related charges, and the State did not prove that there was a causal connection between his “crimes” and Serata’s loss.”
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307(2) — 1 case
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307(5) — 3 cases
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc., 2015 MT 284 (Mont. 2015). “The District Court concluded the following: “Misrepresentation” under § 30-10-307(1), MCA, is not a matter of strict liability but requires a showing of failure to use reasonable care regarding the truth or accuracy of statements made in the offer or sale of a security; Forquest…”
Waveland Capital Partners, LLC v. Tommerup, 928 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (D. Mont. 2013). “§ 27-2-211, two years statute of limitations), — the Montana and Utah Securities Act claims (two years statute of limitations, Mont.Code Ann. § 30-10-307(5), and Utah Code Ann.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307(5)(a) — 1 case
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-10-307(5)(b) — 2 cases
Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc., 2015 MT 284 (Mont. 2015). “The District Court concluded the following: “Misrepresentation” under § 30-10-307(1), MCA, is not a matter of strict liability but requires a showing of failure to use reasonable care regarding the truth or accuracy of statements made in the offer or sale of a security; Forquest…”
Mosley v. Am. Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 2010 MT 78 (Mont. 2010). “However, it is up to the Legislature, not this Court, to address this issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.