Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE · CHAPTER 14. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION · Part 9. Price Discrimination
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-906 (2026)

Injunctions -- Damages -- Production Of Evidence

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 30
  3. CHAPTER 14
  4. Part 9
  5. 30-14-906 Injunctions -- damages -- production of evidence

TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE

CHAPTER 14. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION

Part 9. Price Discrimination

Injunctions -- Damages -- Production Of Evidence

30-14-906. Injunctions -- damages -- production of evidence. (1) A person who is injured by a violation of 30-14-901 may maintain an action to enjoin a continuance of an act in violation of 30-14-901 and to recover damages. A court, upon finding that the defendant is violating or has violated the provisions of 30-14-901, shall enjoin the defendant from continuing the violation. It is not necessary to allege or prove actual damages to the plaintiff.

(2) In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant three times the amount of actual damages sustained plus attorney fees and costs of suit.

(3) A defendant in an action brought under this section may be required to testify under the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, the books and records of a defendant may be brought into court and introduced into evidence by reference. Information so obtained may not be used against the defendant as a basis for a misdemeanor prosecution for a violation of 30-14-901.

History: En. Sec. 6, Ch. 486, L. 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: Porcell v. Lincoln Wood Prods., Inc., 713 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (D.N.M. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Porcell v. Lincoln Wood Prods., Inc., 713 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (D.N.M. 2010). “§ 6-1-113; Idaho Code § 48-608 (5); Mont.Code Ann. § 30-14-906(2); Nev.Rev.Stat.”
Rashid v. Jolly, 2009 MT 296 (Mont. 2009). · cites it 2× “¶ 34 Finally, Rashid, again through counsel, makes a purblind claim that she is entitled to her attorney fees in this breach of contract action under Montana's Consumer Protection Act, § 30-14-906, MCA, because Jolly somehow, in the price he charged, illegally discriminated…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-906(2): 1 case
Porcell v. Lincoln Wood Prods., Inc., 713 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (D.N.M. 2010). “§ 6-1-113; Idaho Code § 48-608 (5); Mont.Code Ann. § 30-14-906(2); Nev.Rev.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.