30-3-301. Person entitled to enforce instrument. "Person entitled to enforce" an instrument means the holder of an instrument, a nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to 30-3-309. A person may be a person entitled to enforce the instrument even though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 30-3-301 (2026)
Person Entitled To Enforce Instrument
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE
CHAPTER 3. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
Part 3. Rights of a Holder
Person Entitled To Enforce Instrument
History: En. Sec. 3-301, Ch. 264, L. 1963; R.C.M. 1947, 87A-3-301; amd. Sec. 114, Ch. 410, L. 1991.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: First SEC. Bank of Bozeman v. Goddard, 593 P.2d 1040 (Mont. 1979).
First SEC. Bank of Bozeman v. Goddard, 593 P.2d 1040 (Mont. 1979). “1947, now section 30-3-301 MCA, or as a holder in due course under section 87A-3-305, R.”
Hofman v. HSBC Bank USA, NA ex rel. Nomura Home Equity Loan Inc Asset-backed Certificates (In re Hofman), 488 B.R. 157 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2013). “MCA § 30-3-301. In this case, the note at Ex.”
Est. of B. Haler, 2026 MT 111 (Mont. 2026). “4 ¶9 The District Court also concluded that the cashier’s check was a negotiable instrument under § 30-3-104(7), MCA; that Bradley left it in the home and thereby “constructively delivered” it to Rebecca under § 30-3-210(1), MCA; and that Rebecca was the “holder” and thus a…”
Leilani Hope Rickert (Bankr. D. Mont. 2019). “Mont. Code Ann. § 30-3-301 , and In re Tipton, at *2.”
In re: Leilani Hope Rickert (9th Cir. BAP 2020). “Mont. Code Ann. § 30-3-301 . Here, the bankruptcy court found that the note is a negotiable 10 instrument that was indorsed in blank by SunTrust.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.