Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-547 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 35. CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS

CHAPTER 1. MONTANA BENEFIT CORPORATION ACT

Part 5. Shareholders (Repealed)

Repealed

35-1-547. Repealed. Secs. 269, 274, Ch. 271, L. 2019.

History: En. Sec. 73, Ch. 368, L. 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2018 · leading case: McCann v. McCann, 425 P.3d 682 (Mont. 2018).
McCann v. McCann, 425 P.3d 682 (Mont. 2018). · cites it 4× “" Alternatively, the District Court held that Wold was entitled to fees under § 35-1-547(2), MCA, to the extent the case was a derivative action, acknowledging again that Genet's claims against Wold were not entirely clear.”
Sletteland v. Roberts, 2003 MT 17 (Mont. 2003). · cites it 22× “(2) order the plaintiff to pay defendant’s reasonable expenses including attorney fees, incurred in defending the proceeding if it finds that the proceeding was commenced or maintained without reasonable cause or for an improper purpose; or (3) order a party to pay an opposing…”
Blue Dane Simmental v. Am. Sim, 1998 MT 260N (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “However, it denied the ASA its attorney fees pursuant to § 35-1-547, MCA, holding that this action was not commenced for an improper purpose.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-547(2): 2 cases
McCann v. McCann, 425 P.3d 682 (Mont. 2018). “" Alternatively, the District Court held that Wold was entitled to fees under § 35-1-547(2), MCA, to the extent the case was a derivative action, acknowledging again that Genet's claims against Wold were not entirely clear.”
Sletteland v. Roberts, 2003 MT 17 (Mont. 2003). “(2) order the plaintiff to pay defendant’s reasonable expenses including attorney fees, incurred in defending the proceeding if it finds that the proceeding was commenced or maintained without reasonable cause or for an improper purpose; or (3) order a party to pay an opposing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.