Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 35. CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS · CHAPTER 1. MONTANA BENEFIT CORPORATION ACT · Part 9. Dissolution and Liquidation (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-935 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 35
  3. CHAPTER 1
  4. Part 9
  5. 35-1-935 Repealed

TITLE 35. CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS

CHAPTER 1. MONTANA BENEFIT CORPORATION ACT

Part 9. Dissolution and Liquidation (Renumbered and Repealed)

Repealed

35-1-935. Repealed. Secs. 269, 274, Ch. 271, L. 2019.

History: En. Sec. 151, Ch. 368, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 69, L. 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1999–2011 · leading case: Allen v. Atl. Richfield Co., 2005 MT 281, 124 P.3d 132.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. Atl. Richfield Co., 2005 MT 281, 124 P.3d 132. · cites it 24× “¶ 15 The legislature repealed § 35-1-930, MCA (1989), in 1991 and replaced it with two statutes, § 35-1-935, MCA, and § 35-1-937, MCA. These corporate survival statutes maintain the status quo concerning corporate rights and responsibilities before and after dissolution.”
State v. Debus, 2002 MT 307, 59 P.3d 1154. · cites it 20× “¶ 28 We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find that Debus was not authorized to issue personal checks from Virtual's corporate account.”
CR WEAVER v. Advanced Refrigeration, 2011 MT 174, 257 P.3d 378. · cites it 3× “Section 35-1-935(2)(e), MCA. ¶ 19 We affirm the grant of summary judgment to ARS.”
Gossman v. Greatland Directional Drilling, Inc., 973 P.2d 93 (Alaska 1999). “1998) (2 years); Mont.Code Ann. §§ 35-1-935 to -937 (1997); Neb.”
In Re the Est. of James, 2004 MT 314, 102 P.3d 12. · cites it 8× “Section 35-1-935, MCA, prescribes the effect of the dissolution to which the Montana Secretary of State subjected Monte Christo.”
Jarvar v. Title Cash of Montana, Inc. (In Re Jarvar), 430 B.R. 607 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2010). · cites it 2× “” At page 10 and continuing to the end of page 11 Plaintiff raises new theories seeking to hold Hutcheson personally liable under MCA § 35-1-935 and § 35-1-937. These statutes are not found in the Plaintiffs 3rd Complaint, or in Plaintiffs second motion for summary judgment and…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-935(1): 1 case
State v. Debus, 2002 MT 307, 59 P.3d 1154. “¶ 28 We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find that Debus was not authorized to issue personal checks from Virtual's corporate account.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-935(2)(c): 1 case
State v. Debus, 2002 MT 307, 59 P.3d 1154. “¶ 28 We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find that Debus was not authorized to issue personal checks from Virtual's corporate account.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 35-1-935(2)(e): 1 case
CR WEAVER v. Advanced Refrigeration, 2011 MT 174, 257 P.3d 378. “Section 35-1-935(2)(e), MCA. ¶ 19 We affirm the grant of summary judgment to ARS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.