Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 37. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS · CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS · Part 3. Uniform Professional Licensing and Regulation Procedures
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 37-1-307 (2026)

Board Authority

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 37
  3. CHAPTER 1
  4. Part 3
  5. 37-1-307 Board authority

TITLE 37. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Part 3. Uniform Professional Licensing and Regulation Procedures

Board Authority

37-1-307. Board authority. (1) A board may:

(a) hold hearings as provided in this part;

(b) issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents and administer oaths in connection with investigations and disciplinary proceedings under this part. Subpoenas must be relevant to the complaint and must be signed by a member of the board. Subpoenas may be enforced as provided in 2-4-104.

(c) authorize depositions and other discovery procedures under the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure in connection with an investigation, hearing, or proceeding held under this part;

(d) establish a screening panel to:

(i) review nonroutine license applications to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that an applicant has violated a particular statute, rule, or standard justifying restriction or denial of licensure; and

(ii) determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that a licensee has violated a particular statute, rule, or standard justifying disciplinary proceedings;

(e) grant or deny a license within 45 calendar days of receiving a complete application, including the confidential criminal justice information report, and notify an applicant within 10 days of receiving an application of any deficiencies for an incomplete application or provide information as to any exigent circumstances that may delay issuing a license in the 45 days; and

(f) on a finding of unprofessional conduct by an applicant or license holder, impose a sanction provided by this chapter.

(2) A screening panel is an agency for the purposes of summary suspensions under 2-4-631. A screening panel shall specify in writing the particular statute, rule, or standard that the panel believes may have been violated. The screening panel shall also state in writing the reasonable grounds that support the panel's finding that a violation may have occurred. The assigned board members may not subsequently participate in a hearing of the case. The final decision on the case must be made by a majority of the board members who did not serve on the screening panel for the case.

(3) Each board is designated as a criminal justice agency within the meaning of 44-5-103 for the purpose of obtaining confidential criminal justice information, as defined in 44-5-103, regarding the board's licensees and license applicants and regarding possible unlicensed practice, but the board may not record or retain any confidential criminal justice information without complying with the provisions of the Montana Criminal Justice Information Act of 1979, Title 44, chapter 5.

(4) A board may contact and request information from the department of justice, which is designated as a criminal justice agency within the meaning of 44-5-103, for the purpose of obtaining criminal history record information regarding the board's licensees and license applicants and regarding possible unlicensed practice.

(5) (a) A board that is statutorily authorized to obtain a criminal record background report as a prerequisite to the issuance of a license shall require the applicant to submit a full set of fingerprints for the purpose of fingerprint checks by the Montana department of justice and the federal bureau of investigation.

(b) The applicant shall sign a release of information to the board and is responsible to the department of justice for the payment of all fees associated with the criminal record background report.

(c) On completion of the criminal record background check, the department of justice shall forward all criminal history record information, as defined in 44-5-103, in any jurisdiction to the board as authorized in 44-5-303.

(d) At the conclusion of any background check required by this section, the board must receive the criminal record background report but may not receive the fingerprint card of the applicant. On receipt of the criminal record background report, the department of justice shall promptly destroy the fingerprint card of the applicant.

[(6) Each board shall require a license applicant to provide the applicant's social security number as a part of the application. Each board shall keep the social security number from this source confidential, except that a board may provide the number to the department of public health and human services for use in administering Title IV-D of the Social Security Act.] (Bracketed language terminates on occurrence of contingency--sec. 1, Ch. 27, L. 1999.)

History: En. Sec. 7, Ch. 429, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 22, Ch. 552, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 230, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 492, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 16, Ch. 467, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 389, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 100, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 195, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 287, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 279, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: Goldstein v. Comm'n on Practice of the Supreme Court, 2000 MT 8 (Mont. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goldstein v. Comm'n on Practice of the Supreme Court, 2000 MT 8 (Mont. 2000). · cites it 4× “See § 37-1-307(1)(e), MCA. Goldstein and Albers cite that as a due process protection.”
Nelson v. State of Montana, 2008 MT 336 (Mont. 2008). · cites it 3× “Likewise, any Board which decides that a license applicant is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety may restrict or limit the practice of the applicant, require completion of specific programs, monitor the practice, or establish conditions of probation for a…”
Lowry v. State, 2026 MT 71N (Mont. 2026). · cites it 2× “2 The Panel renders the Board’s final order in a contested case, pursuant to § 37-1-307(1)(d), MCA (2023). 3 § 2-4-621(3), MCA, the Board adopted the Hearing Officer’s proposed decision.”
Goldstein Albers v. Comm'n On, 2000 MT 8 (Mont. 2000). · cites it 4× “See § 37-1-307(1)(e), MCA. Goldstein and Albers cite that as a due process protection.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 37-1-307(1)(d): 1 case
Lowry v. State, 2026 MT 71N (Mont. 2026). “2 The Panel renders the Board’s final order in a contested case, pursuant to § 37-1-307(1)(d), MCA (2023). 3 § 2-4-621(3), MCA, the Board adopted the Hearing Officer’s proposed decision.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 37-1-307(1)(e): 3 cases
Goldstein v. Comm'n on Practice of the Supreme Court, 2000 MT 8 (Mont. 2000). “See § 37-1-307(1)(e), MCA. Goldstein and Albers cite that as a due process protection.”
Nelson v. State of Montana, 2008 MT 336 (Mont. 2008). “Likewise, any Board which decides that a license applicant is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety may restrict or limit the practice of the applicant, require completion of specific programs, monitor the practice, or establish conditions of probation for a…”
Goldstein Albers v. Comm'n On, 2000 MT 8 (Mont. 2000). “See § 37-1-307(1)(e), MCA. Goldstein and Albers cite that as a due process protection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.