Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 37. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS · CHAPTER 29. DENTURITRY · Part 1. General
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 37-29-103 (2026)

Association With Dentists Permitted

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 37
  3. CHAPTER 29
  4. Part 1
  5. 37-29-103 Association with dentists permitted

TITLE 37. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

CHAPTER 29. DENTURITRY

Part 1. General

Association With Dentists Permitted

37-29-103. Association with dentists permitted. A licensed denturist may enter into any lawful agreement with a dentist regarding fees, compensation, and business association.

History: En. Sec. 19, I.M. No. 97, approved Nov. 6, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1991–1998 · leading case: Brisendine v. State, Dept. of Com., 833 P.2d 1019 (Mont. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brisendine v. State, Dept. of Com., 833 P.2d 1019 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 9× “The record does not contain any final decision from the Board. On October 30, 1990, appellant filed a complaint in District Court seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief.”
Brisendine v. State, 253 Mont. 361 (Mont. 1991). · cites it 9× “On October 30,1990, appellant filed a complaint in District Court seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Specifically, appellant requested the court to decide whether he could enter into a business association with a dentist as allowed under § 37-29-103, MCA.”
Ridley v. Guar. Nat'l Ins., 951 P.2d 987 (Mont. 1997). · cites it 2× “Before the Board issued its final decision, Brisendine filed a complaint in district court for a declaratory judgment to the effect that § 37-29-103, MCA, did not prohibit him from entering into a business association with a dentist.”
Ridley v. Guar. Nat. Ins. Co., 951 P.2d 987 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “Before the Board issued its final decision, Brisendine filed a complaint in district court for a declaratory judgment to the effect that § 37-29-103, MCA, did not prohibit him from entering into a business association with a dentist.”
Brisendine v. Mt. Dept. of Commerc, No. 91-218 (Mont. May 21, 1992). · cites it 3× “Section 37-29-103, MCA, further confuses plaintiff‘s rights by allowing denturists to form business associations with dentists.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.