39-71-501. Definition of uninsured employer. For the purposes of 39-71-501, 39-71-503 through 39-71-511, 39-71-515 through 39-71-520, and 39-71-541, "uninsured employer" means an employer who has not properly complied with the provisions of 39-71-401.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 39-71-501 (2026)
Definition Of Uninsured Employer
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 39. LABOR
CHAPTER 71. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Part 5. Uninsured Employers
Definition Of Uninsured Employer
History: En. 92-212 by Sec. 4, Ch. 550, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 92-212(part); amd. Sec. 62, Ch. 397, L. 1979; amd. Sec. 179, Ch. 42, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 377, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 112, L. 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: Zempel v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 938 P.2d 658 (Mont. 1997).
Zempel v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 938 P.2d 658 (Mont. 1997). “Did the Workers' Compensation Court err in concluding that § 39-71-501, MCA (1991), as applied, does not deny Zempel equal protection of the laws? 2.”
Dahl v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 1999 MT 168 (Mont. 1999). “(collectively referred to as "Dahl"), were uninsured employers under § 39-71-501, MCA (1993). We reverse the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Auto Parts v. Emp. Relations Div. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 2001 MT 72 (Mont. 2001). “” Section 39-71-501, MCA (1995). An employer who “has not properly complied,” is one that is not covered by one of the three approved plans.”
Buerkley v. Aspen Meadows Ltd. P'ship, 1999 MT 97 (Mont. 1999). “l, Buerkley contends that an employer who has not properly complied with the requirements of § 39-71-401, MCA (1993), is an “uninsured employer” pursuant to § 39-71-501, MCA (1993), and, therefore, subject to the civil remedies provided pursuant to §§ 39-71-508 and -515, MCA…”
Cottrill v. Cottrill Sodding Serv., 744 P.2d 895 (Mont. 1987). “Section 39-71-501, et seq. The class of employees being considered for equal protection purposes under the Constitution are “members of an employer’s family dwelling in the employer’s household” Section 39-71- *44 401(2)(c), MCA, as compared to members of an employer’s family…”
Boehm v. Alanon Club, 722 P.2d 1160 (Mont. 1986). “However, only employers who are uninsured, as defined by Section 39-71-501, MCA, are subject to such an action.”
Waldo v. Montana Dep't of Labor & Indus. Uninsured Employers Fund (In Re Waldo), 186 B.R. 118 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1995). “However, on the date of the injury Debtor had no workers’ compensation insurance. Debtor’s lack of coverage resulted in a claim by Loos’ widow against the UEF pursuant to the uninsured employer provisions of the Montana workers’ compensation law.”
CNA Ins. Companies v. Dunn, 902 P.2d 1014 (Mont. 1995). “An uninsured employer is defined in § 39-71-501, MCA, as “an employer who has not properly complied with the provisions of 39-71-401 [requiring an employer to elect to be bound by a plan].”
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Bush Hog, LLC, 2009 MT 349 (Mont. 2009). “If a subsequent contribution or indemnification action is permitted, is an “uninsured employer” as that term is defined by §39-71-501, MCA, prohibited from bringing such a contribution and/or indemnification action? ¶2 We accepted the certified questions by order filed on…”
Asurion Servs., LLC v. Montana Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 2017 MT 140 (Mont. 2017). “Harris’s claims were made and accepted by Lumbermens in 2002, before Lumbermens’ insolvency.”
Caldwell v. Great W. Sugar Co., 746 P.2d 627 (Mont. 1987). “Under § 39-71-501, MCA, an "uninsured employer" means an employer who has not properly complied with the provisions of S 39-71-401, MCA.”
Hand v. Uninsured Employers' Fund, 2004 MT 336 (Mont. 2004). “During Hand’s employment, Roush was an uninsured employer within the meaning of § 39-71-501, MCA (1991). ¶5 In 1984, Hand fell while loading hay and injured one or both of his knees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.