Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 41. MINORS · CHAPTER 3. CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT · Part 6. Parent-Child LegalRelationship Termination -- Reinstatement
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-610 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 41
  3. CHAPTER 3
  4. Part 6
  5. 41-3-610 Repealed

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 3. CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT

Part 6. Parent-Child LegalRelationship Termination -- Reinstatement

Repealed

41-3-610. Repealed. Sec. 33, Ch. 504, L. 2003.

History: En. Sec. 7, Ch. 420, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 388, L. 1985.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1994–1999 · leading case: In re J.J.G., 880 P.2d 808 (Mont. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re J.J.G., 880 P.2d 808 (Mont. 1994). · cites it 2× “because it is the agency which has the authority to make a permanent placement plan pursuant to § 41-3-610, MCA, and has the authority to place him for adoption pursuant to § 40-8-108, MCA.”
State Dep't of Pub. Health & Human Servs. v. Heinzen, 1999 MT 173 (Mont. 1999). · cites it 2× “¶22 The District Court also reasoned, under conclusion 3 set forth above, that Heinzen’s parental rights could be terminated under the alternative rationale of § 41-3-610(4)(c), MCA, which provides that no treatment plan is required if the court finds, following a hearing, that…”
In re J.J.G., 1998 MT 28 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “It denied the Thompsons’ motion to amend the August 12, 1996, order, dismissed the Thompsons’ petition for permanent custody pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, and awarded permanent legal custody of J.J.G.”
In Re Jjg, 1998 MT 28 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “It denied the Thompsons' motion to amend the August 12, 1996, order, dismissed the Thompsons' petition for permanent custody pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, and awarded permanent legal custody of J.”
Matter of JJG, 880 P.2d 808 (Mont. 1994). · cites it 2× “because it is the agency which has the authority to make a permanent placement plan pursuant to § 41-3-610, MCA, and has the authority to place him for adoption pursuant to § 40-8-108, MCA.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-3-610(4)(c) — 1 case
State Dep't of Pub. Health & Human Servs. v. Heinzen, 1999 MT 173 (Mont. 1999). “¶22 The District Court also reasoned, under conclusion 3 set forth above, that Heinzen’s parental rights could be terminated under the alternative rationale of § 41-3-610(4)(c), MCA, which provides that no treatment plan is required if the court finds, following a hearing, that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.