Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 41. MINORS · CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT · Part 16. Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-1601 (2026)

Short Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 41
  3. CHAPTER 5
  4. Part 16
  5. 41-5-1601 Short title

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT

Part 16. Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act

Short Title

41-5-1601. Short title. This part may be cited as the "Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act".

History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 438, L. 1995; Sec. 41-5-1101, MCA 1995; redes. 41-5-1601 by Sec. 47, Ch. 286, L. 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: State v. Lindsey, 2011 MT 46 (Mont. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Lindsey, 2011 MT 46 (Mont. 2011). · cites it 2× “Lindsey’s attorney told the District Court at the hearing and again in a brief that Lindsey agreed that a dual youth court-adult sentence under § 41-5-1601, MCA, was appropriate. While the District Court awaited briefing from the State, Lindsey pled guilty to the sexual *368…”
In re S.L.M., 951 P.2d 1365 (Mont. 1997). “The appellants in these five appeals challenge the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act, §§ 41-5-1601 through -1607, MCA, (EJPA) as being unconstitutional under the equal protection, due process and double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Montana constitutions, as well…”
Matter of D.C. Jr. a Youth, 2014 MT 292N (Mont. 2014). “appeals from the Youth Court’s oral pronouncement of a sentence under the Extended Juvenile Prosecution Act (EJPA), §§ 41-5-1601 to -1607, MCA, which included a stayed adult sentence that did not specify the type of commitment or length of sentence.”
Matter of SLM, 951 P.2d 1365 (Mont. 1997). “The appellants in these five appeals challenge the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act, §§ 41-5-1601 through -1607, MCA, (EJPA) as being unconstitutional under the equal protection, due process and double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Montana constitutions, as well…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.