Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 41. MINORS · CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT · Part 5. Proceeding on Petition (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-511 (2026)

Renumbered 41-5-1413

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 41
  3. CHAPTER 5
  4. Part 5
  5. 41-5-511 Renumbered 41-5-1413

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT

Part 5. Proceeding on Petition (Renumbered and Repealed)

Renumbered 41-5-1413

41-5-511. Renumbered 41-5-1413. Sec. 47, Ch. 286, L. 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2009 · leading case: State v. City Court of City of Billings, 662 P.2d 276 (Mont. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. City Court of City of Billings, 662 P.2d 276 (Mont. 1983). · cites it 18× “The petitioner argues Judge Bjertness failed to follow the clear mandates of section 41-5-511, MCA, section 61-12-601, MCA, and our recent case of Edward v.”
In Re the Application of Peterson, 767 P.2d 319 (Mont. 1989). · cites it 8× “Most important, § 41-5-511, MCA, provides that a youth has the right to counsel at all stages of the proceedings.”
State v. Allen, 2009 MT 124 (Mont. 2009). · cites it 7× “Allen cites § 41-5-511, MCA (1995), to argue that his right to counsel in the 1997 DUI proceedings could not be waived without the consent of his parents.”
EDWARD C. v. Collings, 632 P.2d 325 (Mont. 1981). · cites it 3× “Section 41-5-511, MCA, provides that: “In all proceedings following the filing of a petition alleging a delinquent youth or youth in need of supervision, the youth and the parents or guardian of the youth shall be advised by the court or, in *430 the absence of the court, by its…”
In re J.F., 710 P.2d 705 (Mont. 1985). · cites it 3× “We also note that Section 41-5-511, MCA, provides that the youth and parents should be advised by the court following the filing of a petition, that the youth may be represented by counsel in all stages of the proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.