Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-526 (2026)

Renumbered 41-5-122

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT

Part 5. Proceeding on Petition (Renumbered and Repealed)

Renumbered 41-5-122

41-5-526. Renumbered 41-5-122. Sec. 47, Ch. 286, L. 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1995 · leading case: In Re the Application of Peterson, 767 P.2d 319 (Mont. 1989).
In Re the Application of Peterson, 767 P.2d 319 (Mont. 1989). · cites it 8× “We conclude that § 41-5-526, MCA, provides the Youth Court with authority to order the delinquent youth to be placed with the Department.”
In re A.Z.G., 905 P.2d 1098 (Mont. 1995). · cites it 2× “The legislature, in § 41-5-526(4), MCA (1993), specifically provided that the youth placement committee may recommend to DFS the youth’s placement with his parent or other family member as an alternative to placement in a licensed facility or with a guardian.”
Matter of A.Z.G. (Mont. 1995). “The legislature, in § 41-5-526(4), MCA (1993), specifically provided that the youth placement committee may recommend to DFS the youth's placement with his parent or other family member as an alternative to placement in a licensed facility or with a guardian.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-526(4) — 2 cases
In re A.Z.G., 905 P.2d 1098 (Mont. 1995). “The legislature, in § 41-5-526(4), MCA (1993), specifically provided that the youth placement committee may recommend to DFS the youth’s placement with his parent or other family member as an alternative to placement in a licensed facility or with a guardian.”
Matter of A.Z.G. (Mont. 1995). “The legislature, in § 41-5-526(4), MCA (1993), specifically provided that the youth placement committee may recommend to DFS the youth's placement with his parent or other family member as an alternative to placement in a licensed facility or with a guardian.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.