Notes of Decisions
Cited in
51
cases (
12 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case:
State v. Moore, 2012 MT 95 (Mont. 2012).
State v. Moore, 2012 MT 95 (Mont. 2012).
· cites it 27× “We noted that the court could have imposed jury costs upon the defendant pursuant to § 46-18-232, MCA, after “a proper determination that [the defendant] ‘is or will be able to pay them.”
State v. B. Thompson, 2017 MT 107 (Mont. 2017).
· cites it 14× “(§ 46-18-232, MCA). The PSI included also a financial profile of Thompson and his family that detailed their income, assets, and debts.”
State v. M. Reynolds, 2017 MT 317 (Mont. 2017).
· cites it 11× “He argued, based on Reynolds’s social security income and financial resources, that it is unreasonable that Reynolds can be found to have the ability to pay this fee; that it is a hardship under § 46-18-232, MCA; and that it is a violation of Mr.”
State v. D. Ingram, 2020 MT 327 (Mont. 2020).
· cites it 12× “or $100 per felony case[,] whichever is greater (§ 46-18-232, MCA) . . . TOTAL $100.00 . .”
State v. Weinberger, 665 P.2d 202 (Mont. 1983).
· cites it 18× “Whether section 46-18-232, MCA, which allows imposition of trial costs against a convicted defendant, is unconstitutional; and 6.”
State v. Madplume, 2017 MT 40 (Mont. 2017).
· cites it 5× “Due to the potential chilling effect a sentence to pay jury costs could have on a defendant’s constitutional right to request a jury trial, trial courts must “scrupulously and meticulously” determine the defendant’s ability to pay those costs.”
Montana v. Fertterer, 841 P.2d 467 (Mont. 1992).
· cites it 16× “We conclude that the plain and unambiguous language of § 46-18-232, MCA, establishes that the District Court properly assessed all costs associated with jury service.”
State v. Stephenson, 2008 MT 64 (Mont. 2008).
· cites it 6× “Section 46-18-232, MCA, provides authority for the court to require a convicted defendant in a felony or misdemeanor case to pay certain costs.”
State v. VanWinkle, 2008 MT 208 (Mont. 2008).
· cites it 12× “" Moreover, § 46-18-232, MCA, provides that a sentencing court may require a convicted defendant to pay costs as defined in § 25-10-201, MCA.”
State v. N. Hardin, 2023 MT 132 (Mont. 2023).
· cites it 8× “Section 46-18-232(1), MCA, allows a district court to require a defendant to pay the “costs of jury service, costs of prosecution, and the cost of pretrial .”
State v. R. Gibbons, 2024 MT 63 (Mont. 2024).
· cites it 6× “” Section 46-18-232, MCA. “In determining the amount and method of payment of costs, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the defendant, the future ability of the defendant to pay costs, and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose.”
State v. Hammer, 2013 MT 203 (Mont. 2013).
· cites it 9× “Here, the Court imposed a supervision fee pursuant to §46-23-1031, MCA; a felony offense surcharge pursuant to §46-18-236(l)(b), MCA; a victim and witness advocate program surcharge pursuant to §46-18-236(l)(c), MCA; a court information technology fee pursuant to §3-1- 317, MCA;…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-232(1) — 20 cases
State v. Moore, 2012 MT 95 (Mont. 2012).
“We noted that the court could have imposed jury costs upon the defendant pursuant to § 46-18-232, MCA, after “a proper determination that [the defendant] ‘is or will be able to pay them.”
Montana v. Fertterer, 841 P.2d 467 (Mont. 1992).
“We conclude that the plain and unambiguous language of § 46-18-232, MCA, establishes that the District Court properly assessed all costs associated with jury service.”
State v. D. Ingram, 2020 MT 327 (Mont. 2020).
“or $100 per felony case[,] whichever is greater (§ 46-18-232, MCA) . . . TOTAL $100.00 . .”
State v. Madplume, 2017 MT 40 (Mont. 2017).
“Due to the potential chilling effect a sentence to pay jury costs could have on a defendant’s constitutional right to request a jury trial, trial courts must “scrupulously and meticulously” determine the defendant’s ability to pay those costs.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-232(2) — 20 cases
State v. Moore, 2012 MT 95 (Mont. 2012).
“We noted that the court could have imposed jury costs upon the defendant pursuant to § 46-18-232, MCA, after “a proper determination that [the defendant] ‘is or will be able to pay them.”
State v. M. Reynolds, 2017 MT 317 (Mont. 2017).
“He argued, based on Reynolds’s social security income and financial resources, that it is unreasonable that Reynolds can be found to have the ability to pay this fee; that it is a hardship under § 46-18-232, MCA; and that it is a violation of Mr.”
State v. Madplume, 2017 MT 40 (Mont. 2017).
“Due to the potential chilling effect a sentence to pay jury costs could have on a defendant’s constitutional right to request a jury trial, trial courts must “scrupulously and meticulously” determine the defendant’s ability to pay those costs.”
State v. D. Ingram, 2020 MT 327 (Mont. 2020).
“or $100 per felony case[,] whichever is greater (§ 46-18-232, MCA) . . . TOTAL $100.00 . .”
State v. Hammer, 2013 MT 203 (Mont. 2013).
“Here, the Court imposed a supervision fee pursuant to §46-23-1031, MCA; a felony offense surcharge pursuant to §46-18-236(l)(b), MCA; a victim and witness advocate program surcharge pursuant to §46-18-236(l)(c), MCA; a court information technology fee pursuant to §3-1- 317, MCA;…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-232(3) — 3 cases
State v. B. Thompson, 2017 MT 107 (Mont. 2017).
“(§ 46-18-232, MCA). The PSI included also a financial profile of Thompson and his family that detailed their income, assets, and debts.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-232(l) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.